What's a landley?
Hey all,
I noticed today that dwm has click-to-focus monitors (if those
monitors have no clients), which seemed to me a bit at odds with dwm's
general sloppy focus approach. I've attached a patch which fixes this
for my multimonitor setup, at least.
(Also, why is the XWindowAttributes variable in
On 14 November 2011 11:53, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> I noticed today that dwm has click-to-focus monitors (if those
> monitors have no clients), which seemed to me a bit at odds with dwm's
> general sloppy focus approach. I've attached a patch which fixes this
> for my multimonitor setup, at leas
On 14 November 2011 16:10, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Here's a small update which seems to work more reliably. (There was a
> race condition.)
Regression fix. Sorry for the spam. ;)
Maybe we can push this to mainline?
cls
dwm-sloppy-monitors.diff
Description: Binary data
Hey,
canto on IRC mentioned that the left-instead-of-right patch changes
dwm's handling of mplayer, making it no longer centre, since
configurerequest only checks that the client is too far right, not too
far left. The attached patch fixes this. I do wonder whether we ought
to just unmap windows i
Hi,
A few problems with the current 'readline' bindings:
C-w is not extremely useful as it considers that anything except
'space' is a word character.
#|
That's now the default bash behavior and it can be overcome by
appending the following lines to your .inputrc:
set bind-tty-special-chars
Hey,
We aren't intending to have 'readline' bindings, readline just happens
to have a few useful bindings we can steal.
On 14/11/2011, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> C-w is not extremely useful as it considers that anything except
> 'space' is a word character.
I actually find this more useful. A lot
On 14 November 2011 17:59, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 16:10, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>> Here's a small update which seems to work more reliably. (There was a
>> race condition.)
>
> Regression fix. Sorry for the spam. ;)
>
> Maybe we can push this to mainline?
Go ahead, make
Connor Lane Smith a écrit :
> On 14/11/2011, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> > C-w is not extremely useful as it considers that anything except
> > 'space' is a word character.
>
> I actually find this more useful. A lot of implementations zip through
> all your non-alnum symbols when you hit C-w, which
On 14/11/2011, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> I happen to use dmenu to move image files around from within sxiv and,
> in this context, I found the default C-w behavior to be inappropriate.
I'll have a think about whether there's a compromise.
> Well, suppose you're using C-f to move down in the list o
Connor Lane Smith a écrit :
> On 14/11/2011, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> > Well, suppose you're using C-f to move down in the list of matches, then
> > you want to move up, you hit C-b because it's the natural symmetric of
> > C-f and you end up moving the cursor backward in the search string.
>
> N
On 14/11/2011, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> This is only true when the search string is empty which is extremely
> rare: most of the times the first thing the user do is to type a few
> characters to filter the results and hence, the cursor is then at the
> end of the search string, C-f will move down
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> What's a landley?
An angry man, judging by the blog. Some of the entries have
interesting history (to someone new to computers, like me).
--Andrew Hills
Hi folks!
Is it possible to use tiling w/ dualhead? i.e. have a separate tiling
area on each monitor - so that if you move a window from monitor 0 to
monitor 1 in floating mode and then move it to the tiling layer, it
stays on monitor 1. (The way it works for my setup right now is that
it's
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jonas H. wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Is it possible to use tiling w/ dualhead? i.e. have a separate tiling area
> on each monitor - so that if you move a window from monitor 0 to monitor 1
> in floating mode and then move it to the tiling layer, it stays on monitor
> 1.
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 09:29:53 PM PST, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> wmii is cursed. Its code base has grown by factor 3 or 4 in terms
> of SLOC, whereas its functionality has stalled.
Thanks Anselm. I think I've held on to the past for too long, and
avoided DWM mainly out of disinterest in C. However, a
16 matches
Mail list logo
