Hi,
Professors at MIT have rewritten Unix V6 in 7000 lines of ANSI C for use in
operating system class. I thought it might interest some people on this list.
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.828/2011/xv6.html
-Truls
This is five years old, and has been discussed on this list at least
once in the past year. Thanks for the reddit feed.
--
# Kurt H Maier
[2011-11-09 14:52] Kurt H Maier
>
> This is five years old, and has been discussed on this list at least
> once in the past year.
How about having all mail to the list going through a program to check if
there are large similarities to old messages in the list archive. If so,
the message would b
On 9 November 2011 19:49, Truls Becken wrote:
> Professors at MIT have rewritten Unix V6 in 7000 lines of ANSI C for use in
> operating system class. I thought it might interest some people on this list.
>
> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.828/2011/xv6.html
Thanks, I look forward to reading this.
Ro
On Monday, 7 November 2011 2:07:44 pm Kurt H Maier wrote:
> The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
> low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
> restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
> interfaces. Your attempt to sidetrack philo
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, 2>&1 wrote:
>
> Ugh. Please read Elements of Style by Strunk & White, especially the
> section
> on lovers of big words.
>
>
hah. way to bite.
Hey did you hear the one about the giant? Nevermind, its over your head.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 4:08 PM, 2>&1 wrote:
> On Monday, 7 November 2011 2:07:44 pm Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
>> low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal
Dnia 9 listopada 2011 23:08 "2>&1" napisał(a):
> Ugh. Please read Elements of Style by Strunk & White, especially the section
> on lovers of big words.
> --
> Regards,
> 2>&1
The Joke Could Be On You.
- brought by,
Big Words Incorporated.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
> [marketing-type distractions]
>
i don't know about you but running dwm + dmenu is about as close to a
suckless DE as it gets (st and surf if you need the whole gamut, and I use
st).
It's funny because they don't realize they've been trolled.
* Seth Hover [2011-11-09 15:37-0800]:
> i don't know about you but running dwm + dmenu is about as close to a
> suckless DE as it gets (st and surf if you need the whole gamut, and I
> use st).
As is OpenBSD, nvi, herbstluftwm, xxxterm and urxvtd. See the issue now?
Everybody has its own preferre
totally; just speaking in terms of suckless projects hosted on suckless.org.
there basically IS a suckless DE. you just have to assemble it (much like
the fact that most suckless tools are meant to be compiled by the user).
apologies if this topquotes, I'm on a cell phone.
On Nov 9, 2011 4:53 PM,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>
> I sometimes wonder whether it would be simpler to just make
> _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN switch dwm into monocle mode. Forcing one
> window to be at the front very often leads me to accidentally focus
> and interact with window hidden behi
13 matches
Mail list logo
