Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Magnus Leuthner
Regardless of the inputs, there is also a bit of work against the rendering of selections in the patch, it's just very convenient to see the presently selected area while still dragging the selection. At least for me the screen draw is incredibly slow, especially with curses applications like alsam

Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 20 April 2011 21:36, Claudio wrote: > Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it > should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else > none of ^e, ^a, and such keystrokes should be available/hardcoded into > the terminal emulator. We should think

Re: [dev] [slock] fixing the annoying combination with PAM

2011-04-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi Markus, On 19 April 2011 22:24, markus schnalke wrote: > at my university PAM is used for user login. They have slock installed > because they have the suckless-tools package (Ubuntu) installed. > > If I run slock , X gets locked like it should. Unfortunately I'm not > able to unlock it again

Re: [dev] [dwm] Moving windows over status bar is very sluggish

2011-04-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 20 April 2011 14:45, emseekay wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:09:03 +0200 > wrote: >> spec: >> -latest, unpatched dwm >> -gpu: radeon 5670, driver xf86-video-ati (radeon) >> >> When I set an existing(!) font in config.h, moving around a floating window >> works until it hits the statusbar and

[dev] [dwm] patch for french (azerty) users

2011-04-21 Thread Thuban
Hi everyone. I just tried to make a path to use dwm and its whole functionnality with an azerty keyboard. It is not always easy to find the keycode for & é " ' replacing 1 2 3 4 ... Because it is the first .diff I build, it might be checked bu someone :) . And also, what do you think of a such pat

Re: [dev] [dwm] NetActiveWindow

2011-04-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi, On 17 April 2011 17:05, Peter John Hartman wrote: >> It is then also possible to use "winctrl" and similar tools which >> depend on _NET_CLIENT_LIST. > > +1 I'm thinking about this during Easter. BR, Anselm

Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Nick
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > In dwm/dmenu and probably st I see some potential to share a single > implementation of draw.c. At first I wanted to create a lib for this, > but when Connor tested this approach in dmenu we concluded, that > additional library depen

Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 21 April 2011 11:39, Nick wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> In dwm/dmenu and probably st I see some potential to share a single >> implementation of draw.c. At first I wanted to create a lib for this, >> but when Connor tested this approach in dmenu we

Re: [dev] [dwm] shiftview patch (shifting tagset left/right )

2011-04-21 Thread Rob
On 19 April 2011 19:32, Fernando C.V. wrote: > Hi, > > I've got what I think might be a better implementation of the > nextprevtag.c patch. > > It's just a simple bitwise left/right circular shift of the tagset, > avoiding the loop that the older patch used and with the additional > benefit of wor

Re: [dev] Re: [PATCH] wmii - client mapping events

2011-04-21 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:15:08PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote: On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: I like this idea, but I don't like that it only applies to the selected view. I'll add an attach event that includes the client and the view. Sure, emitting an event like that

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-21 Thread Rob
On 11 April 2011 14:34, Bryan Bennett wrote: > Your new version of the patch seems to work *MUCH* better. In the couple > tests I've run, the random line noise I was getting before is much improved. > There's still some issues with curses / ncurses / slang applications (I've > yet to identify whic

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-04-21 Thread dtk
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message of Thu Apr 21 02:02:56 +0200 2011: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, dtk wrote: > > Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message: > >> is configurable in any programming language (I use Ruby[1]). > > > > so do i, but it segfaults on me when i start wireshark -.- d

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-04-21 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:04 AM, dtk wrote: > Suraj Kurapati wrote: >> If your Ruby config is based on mine[1], > I think it kind of is. iirc it's based on the one that ships with > wmii per default, which again is based on yours, isn't it? The version that ships with wmii is *ancient*! My confi

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-21 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rob wrote: > I usually use plain text mode and edit the email externally - I > use vimperator, which is a Firefox plugin, and it allows you to > edit text fields with a external editor. Unfortunately the Chromium browser lacks an external editor plugin for HTML te

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-21 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:46:46PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rob wrote: > > I usually use plain text mode and edit the email externally - I > > use vimperator, which is a Firefox plugin, and it allows you to > > edit text fields with a external editor. > > Un

Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Claudio wrote: > Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it > should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else > none of ^e, ^a, and such keystrokes should be available/hardcoded into > the terminal emulator. We shou

Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Leuthner wrote: > Hi, > attached is a patch for st-0.1.1 that will make the following changes: >  - rewrote some of the drawing routines, should be faster now and allows to > draw the selection while selecting Nice, applied. >  - pressing ESC clears select

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-04-21 Thread dtk
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message of Thu Apr 21 21:39:38 +0200 2011: > Your config seems fine. I don't see any glaring problems in it. cool. *huge* thanks for looking into this whole thing!! > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:04 AM, dtk wrote: > The version that ships with wmii is *ancient*! My c

Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc.

2011-04-21 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 21 April 2011 09:20, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > The best compromise we came up with is having a shared draw.c among > dwm and dmenu at least, which is on the agenda for dwm 6.0. Probably > this could also be used for st. For what it's worth, I have been running a version of dwm which uses d

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-04-21 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, dtk wrote: > \o/ you fixed it!! :D actually I only built master just yet, so > haven't thrown neither your current config nor my mods at it yet, > but so far wireshark runs just nicely :) *yaaay!!* :D Correction: Kris fixed it. :) It was a bug inside wmii, after