On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:24:38PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> at my university PAM is used for user login. They have slock installed
> because they have the suckless-tools package (Ubuntu) installed.
>
> If I run slock , X gets locked like it should. Unfortunately I'm not
> able to
Hi all
Two little patches for quark:
1. use strsignal()
2. clean up whitespace/indentation
If useful, you'd maybe want to apply them upstream.
Regards
--
Džen
diff -r d982c42802b4 quark.c
--- a/quark.c Wed Feb 16 20:29:55 2011 +
+++ b/quark.c Wed Apr 20 08:56:03 2011 +0200
@@ -472,14
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:09:03 +0200
wrote:
>
> spec:
> -latest, unpatched dwm
> -gpu: radeon 5670, driver xf86-video-ati (radeon)
>
> When I set an existing(!) font in config.h, moving around a floating window
> works until it hits the statusbar and becomes very laggy.
> It doesn't matter what
Hi Everyone,
So I started using wmii a couple months ago. It was the first time I
wasn't using GNOME and it's default stuff and I did so because a friend
recommended wmii to me. So now I want to know what you all think. Why
are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs? Or not? And what are you
For me dwm just works. I fiddled around with config.h for
maybe an hour after first getting dwm, and since then have
basically left it alone to do its wonders. It's reliable,
quick, and simple.
Plus it's well-written C, so I learn nicely as and when I
want to, poking around to see how things work.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom
wrote:
> Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?
dwm is the only window manager that handles tagging properly.
wmii is not a window manager, it's an obscene object lesson in
unhinged kitchen-sink programming.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Hi,
attached is a patch for st-0.1.1 that will make the following changes:
- rewrote some of the drawing routines, should be faster now and allows to
draw the selection while selecting
- pressing ESC clears selection
- CTRL+left/right jumps words
I'm not sure it's implemented to your standard
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> wmii is not a window manager, it's an obscene object lesson in
> unhinged kitchen-sink programming.
It's endlessly configurable while it's running, which is very convenient.
I prefer dwm/wmii to xmonad because I don't know Haskell and becau
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
> Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?
I like wmii because it (1) has dynamic tagging, views, and columns;
and (2) is configurable in any programming language (I use Ruby[1]).
I've been using wmii since 2005; occasionally tryi
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Andrew Hills wrote:
> It's endlessly configurable while it's running, which is very convenient.
If a program requires endless configuration, it's a bad program.
--
# Kurt H Maier
I like dwm because of the simplicity of the product itself. It's essentially
the simplest example of what I think a tiling window manager should be. I
prefer the Master / Slave idea to Wmii's columns, and dwm implements it in
it's most basic form.
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message of Wed Apr 20 19:39:00 +0200 2011:
> wmii is not perfect, but it does more of what I want than other WMs
> I've tried (perhaps I haven't tried enough of them). I hope Kris
> returns someday to continue its development; I fear it's abandoned.
I also use wmii
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> If a program requires endless configuration, it's a bad program.
The program doesn't require it; I do.
--Andrew Hills
Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it
should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else
none of ^e, ^a, and such keystrokes should be available/hardcoded into
the terminal emulator. We should think in terms of "shell container"
rather than "termi
Uhm... Maybe swk can benefit from this work.. This remembers me to libdraw..
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Claudio wrote:
> Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it
> should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else
> none of ^e, ^a, and such key
Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message of Wed Apr 20 19:39:00 +0200 2011:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
> > Why are dwm and wmii better than other tiling WMs?
>
> I like wmii because it (1) has dynamic tagging,
+1
the /only/ way to do it, in my not so humble opinion ;)
On 04/20/2011 10:27 AM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
Hi Everyone,
So I started using wmii a couple months ago. It was the first time I
wasn't using GNOME and it's default stuff and I did so because a
friend recommended wmii to me. So now I want to know what you all
think. Why are dwm and wmii bette
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:00 PM, dtk wrote:
> Excerpts from Suraj Kurapati's message:
>> is configurable in any programming language (I use Ruby[1]).
>
> so do i, but it segfaults on me when i start wireshark -.- dunno,
> maybe it's due to my modifications (added 'toggle last view' patch
> and som
18 matches
Mail list logo
