Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-04, 02:34): > XFCE terminal binds ctrl-shift-C/V to clipboard copy/paste. They're > not great bindings but they're memorable. Someone mentioned shift- > insert, was that for clipboard or selection paste? Shift-insert > reminds me of DOS edit.exe which used t

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Peter John Hartman
> > 3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting > > URLs is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button > > for pasting. What do you all think about it? > > Middle-button paste is (unfortunately) effectively brain-damaged for > at least half the hardwar

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Kurt H Maier
On 4/4/11, Peter John Hartman wrote: > If you use tmux, you don't need either a urlLauncher function built into > your xvt nor mouse cut-n-paste built into it. Just use their internal > buffers, on the one hand, and bind a key to urlview or whatever to get > the other functionality. This is usele

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Steven Blatchford
On 19:59 Sun 03 Apr, ilf wrote: >3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting >URLs is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button >for pasting. What do you all think about it? This is getting off-topic; if you like urlLauncher I suggest looking at the url-sele

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Peter John Hartman
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:02:10AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On 4/4/11, Peter John Hartman wrote: > > If you use tmux, you don't need either a urlLauncher function built into > > your xvt nor mouse cut-n-paste built into it. Just use their internal > > buffers, on the one hand, and bind a key t

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Peter John Hartman wrote: > Not at all.  Just make sure X forwarding is working properly and that tmux > cut places things in xclip or something like that associated with the right > host.  Ditto with urlviewer. You think that's a good idea? Setting up x11 forward

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Bryan Bennett
While I understand wanting applications to adhere to the Unix Philosophy, it seems to me that inputting and outputting text is what a terminal essentially does and copying & pasting is just a small extension of that role. I'd like to see a sane way of copying & pasting with the keyboard, rather tha

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 4 Apr 2011, at 2:02 pm, Kurt H Maier wrote: If middlemouse paste sucks on your hardware, buy new hardware. I'm in no hurry to change an efficient paradigm because someone got cheap buying a mouse. (Looking at you here, Ethan!) You were the one who said my laptops have their own pointing

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 4 Apr 2011, at 9:10 am, Antoni Grzymala wrote: In my standard X environment most programs accept the convention, that MMB *and* shift-insert insert the selection, while whichever program supports the clipboard it has some clipboard shortcut (and those two do not overlap). I just tested wit

[dev] [st] Better selection support?

2011-04-04 Thread Petr Sabata
Unfortunatelly, many X applications aren't compatible with just UTF8_STRING, so we'll have to do a little more. The patch below checks COMPOUND_TEXT, UTF8_STRING and XA_STRING targets. It makes it more complicated and possibly ugly, but it works... It would be nice to respond with all three suppor

[dev] new column

2011-04-04 Thread Jhonny Boy
I know it is possible to configure wmii to open a particular application in a precise workspace. In the same idea is it possible to open it always in a new column? An other question I found this email in your archive : http://www.mail-archive.com/wmii@suckless.org/msg02157.html I find this idea i

Re: [dev] [st] Better selection support?

2011-04-04 Thread pancake
All that x11 crap hurts my mind. I just wish some day we can rid off all this and cleanup our apps. On 04/04/2011, at 19:09, Petr Sabata wrote: > Unfortunatelly, many X applications aren't compatible with just UTF8_STRING, > so we'll have to do a little more. The patch below checks COMPOUND_TEX

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-04, 17:23): > > In my standard X environment most programs accept the convention, > > that MMB *and* shift-insert insert the selection, while whichever > > program supports the clipboard it has some clipboard shortcut (and > > those two do not overlap). > > I ju

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 4 Apr 2011, at 7:53 pm, Antoni Grzymala wrote: That's why I have the mod4-c shortcut – exactly for turning opera-copied links into a shift-insert insertable selection. Ah, you have mod4-c run something which copies clipboard to selection? There's a little prog in p9p which automatically c