[dev] Re: sta.li progress

2010-10-27 Thread finkler
On 10/12/10 07:58, Wolf Tivy wrote: >> 2. Demonstrate stand-alone static binaries that have been linked >> against bionic/x86. > > This assumes we have bionic itself working. Has anyone actually built it > without building all of android? I got the source, but I can't make it build. > I've tried

Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress

2010-10-27 Thread Jacob Todd
If someone was going to create a "suckless" libc, they shouldn't support posix. start with the plan 9 libraries instead of the obsd while you're at it.

[dev] Re: sta.li progress

2010-10-27 Thread finkler
On 10/28/10 01:16, Jacob Todd wrote: > If someone was going to create a "suckless" libc, they shouldn't support > posix. start with the plan 9 libraries instead of the obsd while you're at > it. > I understand that the idea is to compile other shit, not suckless software, or else we could just use

Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress

2010-10-27 Thread Jacob Todd
Go uses the plan 9 libs.