On 6 Sep 2010, at 5:01 am, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:28:17PM -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:02:58PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
I still don't think that the auto-hinter is nearly up to par with
designer hinted fonts. For the fonts that I have scree
On 6 Sep 2010, at 3:53 am, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:20:47AM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 1 Sep 2010, at 8:30 pm, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 06:00:17PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
If someone were to write a simp
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> I've noticed how Plan's font system allows you to make a unicode font by
> writing a text file referencing other fonts, and thought that was
> light-years ahead of X fonts complete inability to do so. Are you saying Xft
> can automatical
On 4 September 2010 21:25, Uriel wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>> One file per function means a binary will only link the objects it
> needs, which helps keep binary size down when statically linking
>
> The linker should be capable of including only the symbo
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:00:27AM +0800, sqweek wrote:
On 4 September 2010 21:25, Uriel wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
One file per function means a binary will only link the objects it
needs, which helps keep binary size down when statically linking
The l
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:48:15PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
That's no excuse for the absolutely appalling specification format.
Fontconfig may be a reeking pile of insanity, but at least you can
read its specs. Usually a font name by itself is enough, or with a
size, 'Terminus - 12'
Thats great. I should take a look asap.
In fact i wrote a generic abstract tree parser based on some basic parsing
rules so it can parse C, javascript and others, but obviously not as well as
yours. Not supporting macros and others..
I think anselm was already interested on something like this.
Btw. If somebody wanna check my generic parser/abstracttree check
http://hg.youterm.com/alt
- Original message -
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 01:44:06PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > i'm involved in a c parsing tool project, c99tree,
> > and pleased to announce its first release
> >
> >
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:39:31PM +0200, pancake wrote:
I think anselm was already interested on something like this.
So we can probably take it to do a suckless sloc or a c
compiler based in radare2 assembler backend. Which would be far
more minimal than gcc or llvm
I'd also like to see a s
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 5:35 PM, pancake wrote:
> Function per file is because the stupid gnu linker does not statically
> compile functions. Only objects. Afaik. This way the resulting bin can be
> smaller.
>
gcc has -ffunction-sections and ld has -gc-sections.
>From the gcc manual:
-ffunctio
Hello,
Why not just split it, like everybody else does? Plus, other compilers
possibly don't support it. I't quite a convention for libraries, as far as I
know. Instead, you make it work only with gcc, something you usually complain
about as big and sucky that has more fuss than necessary
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 10:10:16PM +0200, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
Why not just split it, like everybody else does? Plus, other
compilers possibly don't support it. I't quite a convention
for libraries, as far as I know. Instead, you make it work
only with gcc, something you usually complain a
Hi everyone,
I'm having problems compiling surf and uzbl because of WebKitGTK+, so I
thought it best to check with you some things.
Which version of WebKitGTK+ are you actually using to compile the latest
versions
of surf?
Also, against which versions of libsoup and icu4c did you compile
WebKit
libwebkit version 1.2.3 from webkitgtk.org
Soup version 2.30.2
icu version 4.4
Good luck :)
>On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:31:11AM +0200, Michael wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm having problems compiling surf and uzbl because of WebKitGTK+, so I
> thought it best to check with you some things.
>
> W
14 matches
Mail list logo
