On 14 May 2010 17:01, mobi phil wrote:
> 3. I am looking for people who would be interested in writing a vim
> clone. I already called it viq (vi quick)
I added a comment to mobiphil's blog.
Cheers,
Anselm
On 14 May 2010 07:41, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02:47AM +0200, pancake wrote:
>> Is simpler to just change a pointer. We can make global. I will do the
>> change tomorrow.
>
> I will review the current state today and provide my comments in detail.
I had a look through ev
On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:48:38 +0100
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 14 May 2010 07:41, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:02:47AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> >> Is simpler to just change a pointer. We can make global. I will do the
> >> change tomorrow.
> >
> > I will review the current
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 06:11:08PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> Check t/ui.c and you will understand why SwkWindow is not global variable.
>
> Do somebody noticed this file? I mean..the UI can be done not only by code..
> also in ascii art. About the other questions..I think i'm not the
> right person
Hi all,
I've dropped by in the IRC channel once or twice but that's unreliable, so I
thought that I'd send an e-mail to the list, as well. I discovered suckless
through stali a week ago when I was searching for information on statically
building WebKit browsers for--believe it or not--a new, all-
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:02:57PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> > 1. good tools should have a way to define easily keyboard shortcuts.
> True. It's quite irritating that some tools use the arrow keys for scrolling,
> others use hjkl (which doesn't make sense on all keyboards) and one
> has to
Hey,
On 15/05/2010, anonymous wrote:
> This behaviour is compatible with unix keybindings
> (http://unix-kb.cat-v.org/). Most (all?) suckless tools follow these
> rules so there are no problems. Maybe they should be documented
> somewhere?
dmenu uses alt for a couple of bindings. Apparently ct
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 05:11:48PM -0400, Ersin Akinci wrote:
> Thus, dynamic libraries would still be used, but at least they would
> be duplicated, independent, and isolated for each program that needed it.
What problem you are trying to solve? You want to make binaries
independent from environ
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:56:43PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 15/05/2010, anonymous wrote:
> dmenu uses alt for a couple of bindings. Apparently ctrl binds are
> shell-like and alt binds are vim-like, which is a bit weird (also
> M-p). I'd prefer to remove the alt ones. That said I do li
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:22:27AM +0400, anonymous wrote:
Also removing Alt keybindings will simplify dmenu code: there will be
only one switch instead of two, one "default" branch instead of two,
less manipulation with masks and everytihing else related.
hjkl for scrolling or cursor movement shouldn't require any metakeys
at all. personally I don't care if they don't work on other key
layouts; something like that is either trivial to repair or the app is
broken.
--
# Kurt H Maier
You're correct, my intentions are quite different and have nothing at all to
do with performance concerns. I'm trying to manifest a certain aesthetic
vision: I like the act of downloading static binaries and deleting them
without worrying about dependencies, complicated directory structures, etc.
On 5/16/10, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> hjkl for scrolling or cursor movement shouldn't require any metakeys
> at all. personally I don't care if they don't work on other key
> layouts; something like that is either trivial to repair or the app is
> broken.
My point was that I do not like having to edi
13 matches
Mail list logo
