On 10 May 2010 01:05, Uriel wrote:
> Does suckless really need a WIMP-toolkit? I hope not.
It's more like WP than WIMP, but I agree that the current route looks
a bit WIMPy to me.
There are two intentions involved in swk: one is to have something
like a modern curses replacement that runs in grap
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:24:43AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> because it's quite a nightmare to work with existing ones for rapid
> prototyping unless you don't want to use something very heavyweight
> like Qt.
What about Tk? It is very useful for prototyping.
Surf changes the window title to reflect the URL of the link under the
pointer. This is good, as it means you can use xmobar or dzen or some
other program to inspect links, rather than having a dedicated pane.
It is also bad, because if you switch away from surf while hovering over
a link, the su
On 05/12/10 13:37, anonymous wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 08:24:43AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
because it's quite a nightmare to work with existing ones for rapid
prototyping unless you don't want to use something very heavyweight
like Qt.
What about Tk? It is very useful for pro
Right now it's not obvious what the widgets actually are. The
textboxes look identical to the buttons and it's hard to know where to
type into.
--
Rory
Tk is not used nowdays, Ttk is used instead and suport Themes, GTK
and Qt based engines, antialising fonts and many more widgets.
Perhaps is not suckless but I think It is the more unix friendly than
other toolkits becouse It is very easy to wrap shell scritps with it.
The only problem is that m
Really nice patch. There were threads about this bug, but nobody
fixed it. Now it is fixed and ^f (links numbering script) works on
suckless.org.
