Re: [dev] Re: stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-12 Thread anonymous
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 06:26:12PM +0200, finkler wrote: > This is my collection of redundancy so far: > arch uname -m > dir ls -C > groupsid -nG > head sed 11q > mkfifomknod FILE q > nlgrep -n > rmdir rm -r > tac

Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

2010-04-12 Thread anonymous
http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Unix_to_Plan_9_command_translation/index.html head = sed 10q

Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

2010-04-12 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:10 PM, markus schnalke wrote: > We don't need head(1) because we have sed(1). But do we get the first > ten lines with >        sed 10q > or with >        sed 11q > ? > > I am a bit confused, currently. > > All sed implementation I had access to printed 10 lines with 10q.

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-12 Thread Uriel
Doing something bad to X.org is a good thing. uriel On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Benoit T wrote: > Hello, > > Debian testing has replaced Xorg 1.7.5 with 1.7.6 about 3 days ago. > Because i had not logged out of my X session in between, i picked up the > new X server only today. > > dwm does

Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

2010-04-12 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 4/12/10, Uriel wrote: > What is your question? he just pointed out that 'sed 11q' incorrectly listed as an alternative to 'head' on cat-v (the correct alternative would be 'sed 10q') but it's a minor detail..

Re: [dev] sed 10q or sed 11q

2010-04-12 Thread hiro
Don't trouble your head about it, sed 11q is just exemplary usage.

[dev] Re: [wmii] disable mouse resizing in non-floating mode

2010-04-12 Thread Jonas H.
On 03/25/2010 01:07 PM, Jonas H. wrote: Hi there, how can I disable resizing windows with the mouse in non-floating mode? I really hate this feature that I can't remember was there in wmii 3.6 because I frequently resize layers accidentally when using a scroll bar. Jonas Noone? :-(

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 4/8/10, Jacob Todd wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:22:49PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: >> ... >> P.S. I'm new here. Why's XML so evil? If you don't have to test for >> well-formed and validness, that is. > http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/xml/ We can all agree that XML is insane as a

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread Lorenzo Bolla
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > On 4/8/10, Jacob Todd wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:22:49PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > >> ... > >> P.S. I'm new here. Why's XML so evil? If you don't have to test for > >> well-formed and validness, that is. > > http://h

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 4/10/10, markus schnalke wrote: > The idea is nice, but this approach will hardly work with today's > broken web. The web technology originally allowed such approaches, but > now it is so heavily abused, that web browsers must suck. Web pages containing only content and W3.org will work flawles

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 4/12/10, Lorenzo Bolla wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius > wrote: > >> On 4/8/10, Jacob Todd wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:22:49PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: >> >> ... >> >> P.S. I'm new here. Why's XML so evil? If you don't have to test for >> >> well

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread Jacob Todd
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 03:31:42PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > On 4/8/10, Jacob Todd wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:22:49PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > >> ... > >> P.S. I'm new here. Why's XML so evil? If you don't have to test for > >> well-formed and validness, that is. > >

Re: [dev] [wmii] disable mouse resizing in non-floating mode

2010-04-12 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Jonas H. wrote: > how can I disable resizing windows with the mouse in non-floating mode? Good point. Why do we have 2 ways of resizing: (1) the traditional WIMP way of putting your cursor on the client border and dragging and (2) pressing grabmod key and right

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread pancake
what about yaml? On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:35:02 -0400 Jacob Todd wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 03:31:42PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > > On 4/8/10, Jacob Todd wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:22:49PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > > >> ... > > >> P.S. I'm new here. Why's XML s

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread Jacob Todd
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:29:56PM +0200, pancake wrote: > what about yaml? I know nothing about yaml. -- I am a man who does not exist for others. pgpx6ENK4GUkG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] dwm does something bad to X.org 1.7.6

2010-04-12 Thread Benoit T
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 01:29:23PM +0200, Uriel wrote: > Doing something bad to X.org is a good thing. fair enough. i have additional data about the phenomenon but nothing conclusive yet. i will share this shortly, in case anybody has an idea. cheers -- Benoit Triquet .''`. : :' : We are

Re: [dev][surf]

2010-04-12 Thread pancake
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Jacob Todd wrote: On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:29:56PM +0200, pancake wrote: what about yaml? I know nothing about yaml. So, RTFM :)