Re: [dev] simple portscanner

2010-01-03 Thread anonymous
Thanks for these fixes. I have applied them and fixed bug (lost break inside switch) while reviewing the code.

Re: [dev] licenses (was: simple portscanner)

2010-01-03 Thread hiro
> most stupid idea ever. if you're in the software industry and wish to make > your > source public you should at least know the potential backdraws of your > country's IP laws (regardless how stupid they may sound) and act properly to > make sure every single person using your stuff might not fac

Re: [dev] licenses (was: simple portscanner)

2010-01-03 Thread Martin Swift
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:19:08PM +0100, hiro wrote: > > as you can't really pass your copyright in germany you should definitely > > base > > your publication on some means of 'contract'/license to protect the one > > using > > your code from you going mad and coming after him with some creepy

Re: [dev] licenses (was: simple portscanner)

2010-01-03 Thread hiro
So then why shouldn't you be able to defend yourself against creepy lawyers? In Germany the law regarding software copyright is completely vague and can't be taken serious. It's more or less undefined. I've heard it was a mess in Austria, too.

Re: [dev] simple portscanner

2010-01-03 Thread Dmitry Maluka
Looks simple and clean. Makefile should contain uninstall rule: diff -r 24c81cd5e477 makefile --- a/makefile Sun Jan 03 15:37:05 2010 +0300 +++ b/makefile Sun Jan 03 19:45:35 2010 +0200 @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ install: $(PROG) cp $(PROG) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/$(PROG) +uninstall: +

Re: [dev] licenses (was: simple portscanner)

2010-01-03 Thread Martin Swift
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:03:38PM +0100, hiro wrote: > So then why shouldn't you be able to defend yourself against creepy lawyers? You should. That's the point. > In Germany the law regarding software copyright is completely vague > and can't be taken serious. Then don't. :-) Cheers, Martin

[dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Julien Pecqueur
Hi, First, i wish you a happy new year :) I have a suggestion for DWM. I use DWM for about months and i miss one functionality : a trayer (a zone for icons in the status bar to reduce applications like xchat or to have icons for applications like gmixer, batterymon, wicd-client) in the status

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread v4hn
How about this one? http://stalonetray.sourceforge.net/ v4hn On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:20:53PM +0100, Julien Pecqueur wrote: > Hi, > > First, i wish you a happy new year :) > > I have a suggestion for DWM. I use DWM for about months and i miss one > functionality : a trayer (a zone for icons

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread anonymous
> Is it planned to implement this in DWM? $ expr 2000 - `wc -l dwm.c | awk '{print $1}'` It is impossible to implement in two lines of code. More probabily status bar will be fully removed from dwm then something will be added to it.

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Thayer Williams
On Jan 03, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Julien Pecqueur wrote: > I have a suggestion for DWM. I use DWM for about months and i miss one > functionality : a trayer (a zone for icons in the status bar to reduce > applications like xchat or to have icons for applications like gmixer, > batterymon, wicd-clien

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Peter John Hartman
Hi, I agree w/r/t removing the status feature in dwm. If it isn't a trayer, then what is its purpose? Of course, primary motivation is that an alternative standalone trayer can do whatever it is that the status feature is doing anyway (or so it seems). Hence, it is superfluous. Peter -- sic

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Julien Pecqueur
Thank you the answer! I tried stalonetray with this config file : $ (j...@archbox)-(~) : cat .stalonetrayrc decorations none dockapp_mode simple fuzzy_edges 3 #geometry #grow_gravity #icon_gravity icon_size 24 sticky true skip_taskbar true transparent true window_layer bottom vertical true window_

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Julien Pecqueur
I tried trayer too. it seems the "least worst" tray application for DWM : http://depot.julienpecqueur.com/scrot_2010-01-03_20-02_1920x1080.png But it is alway in the front of other clients, have borders, and is not sticked on the desktops background like conky... :( Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (03/01/10 19:20), Julien Pecqueur wrote: > Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:20:53 +0100 > From: Julien Pecqueur > To: dev@suckless.org > Subject: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm > List-Id: dev mail list > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) > > Hi, > > First, i wish you a happy new year :) > > I ha

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread markus schnalke
[2010-01-03 13:51] Peter John Hartman > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, anonymous wrote: > > > More probabily > > status bar will be fully removed from dwm then something will be added > > to it. > > I agree w/r/t removing the status feature in dwm. (What does ``w/r/t'' mean?) anonymous did not say that

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Rob
>and is not sticked on the desktops background like conky You can change config.h to sticky a client. I'm not at my box, but it's something like { "Trayer", NULL, NULL, ~0,True,-1 }, ~0 is the binary not of 0, which means every tag, floating is "True". You set

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Julien Pecqueur
I've find this [1] on google... It's exactly what i want! but it's for ion... I'll check the source to understand how it's done and it's possible to write a DWM patch doing this... [1] http://code.google.com/p/trayion/ Le dimanche 03 janvier 2010 à 07:28:08, Rob a écrit : > >and is not sti

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Don Harper
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:28:08PM +, Rob wrote to To dev mail list: > >and is not sticked on the desktops background like conky > You can change config.h to sticky a client. > I'm not at my box, but it's something like > { "Trayer", NULL, NULL, ~0,True,-1

[dev] Re: [ANN] Ruby wmiirc - YAML import feature

2010-01-03 Thread Suraj Kurapati
Suraj Kurapati wrote: > I'm pleased to announce the next evolution of my YAML-based Ruby wmiirc: > >  http://github.com/sunaku/wmiirc I forgot to mention that the YAML structure has changed in this new version, so your old config.yaml will not work as-is. In particular, the following incompatible

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Peter John Hartman dixit (2010-01-03, 13:51): > I agree w/r/t removing the status feature in dwm. If it isn't a > trayer, then what is its purpose? Of course, primary motivation is > that an alternative standalone trayer can do whatever it is that the > status feature is doing anyway (or so it s

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Cengiz Tas
hi.. and happy new year to all. 1) i know how to check for unread mails in gmail and display it in the status bar. can i check for unread chat messages in the same way, too? 2) when i use pidgin with the notification plugin dwm gets an urgent window notification and changes color of the correspo

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread julien
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:20:53PM +0100, Julien Pecqueur wrote: > > I have a suggestion for DWM. I use DWM for about months and i miss one > functionality : a trayer (a zone for icons in the status bar to reduce > applications like xchat or to have icons for applications like gmixer, > battery

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Cengiz Tas dixit (2010-01-03, 22:10): > 1) i know how to check for unread mails in gmail and display it in the > status bar. > can i check for unread chat messages in the same way, too? Pretty much depends on your mail client. mcabber AFAIK can write things to a file/pipe, which you can use to se

Re: [dev] [DWM] suggestion for dwm

2010-01-03 Thread Dmitry Maluka
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:51:15PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > Peter John Hartman dixit (2010-01-03, 13:51): > > The tray “protocol” itself is a totally borken idea of the useless WIMP > paradigm. A workaround for a workaround. Makes even less sense in the > tagged dwm environment. > > As to

Re: [dev] Re: [ANN] Ruby wmiirc - YAML import feature

2010-01-03 Thread Emmanuel Oga
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Suraj Kurapati wrote: > Suraj Kurapati wrote: >> I'm pleased to announce the next evolution of my YAML-based Ruby wmiirc: >> >>  http://github.com/sunaku/wmiirc Suraj: Thanks a lot for your hard work. I just recently started using your ruby based wmiirc and I'm en

Re: [dev] Re: [ANN] Ruby wmiirc - YAML import feature

2010-01-03 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Emmanuel Oga wrote: > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Suraj Kurapati wrote: >> I'm pleased to announce the next evolution of my YAML-based Ruby wmiirc: >> >> http://github.com/sunaku/wmiirc > > Thanks a lot for your hard work. I just recently started using your >