On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:08:13AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
>> No, tagrules works exactly how I want. And for zenity (which is /all/
>> modal dialogs) it's fine. But I can imagine running into a case where
>> I want to float THIS instance
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:20:53PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> However, it is simply not true that it "requires you to use the web
> interface to do anything useful". I have been using Sage extensively
> for teaching and research for the past two years and I spend 95% of my
> time in the command-l
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Christoph Dibak wrote:
But is there a sort of replacement for maple? Does any less-sucking or
open-source software support the maple-worksheet (.mw) format?
Don't Maple worksheets, by definition, suck more? At least,
that's my impression of anything ba
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:30:10AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
I'll probably cave and just compile 3.9 soon enough but it's so untidy
to have to do that every time I install a system and I'm not up to
being maintaining packages yet (and they wouldn't take a 'beta'
anyway). Is there no way in 3.6
suckless calculators: bc, hoc
On 11/20/09, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> In the end, it depends on what you want to do with your CAS. If you
> want something very precise, there is good specialised software around
> (Pari was already mentioned for number theory, GAP is the way to go
> for group theory, M
I always find a limitation to use dmenu instead of gtk entry text
because you cannot edit the URL in a decent way.
markus schnalke wrote:
[2009-11-19 18:57] Moritz Wilhelmy
[...] editing text boxes within an external editor.
You took the words right out of my mouth.
meillo
2009/11/20 pancake :
> I always find a limitation to use dmenu instead of gtk entry text
> because you cannot edit the URL in a decent way.
There is a patch already for this (written by Gottox) which I consider
to make mainstream as well for surf integration (apart from vertical
items and an overh
I use a scary Firefox extension "It's all text!" to get my text area
editable in vim.
Perhaps something like double clicking a textarea (I don't care for
editing input type=text), would simply launch $EDITOR on it.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:20:32AM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
> I use a scary Firefox extension "It's all text!" to get my text area
> editable in vim.
>
> Perhaps something like double clicking a textarea (I don't care for
> editing input type=text), would simply launch $EDITOR on it.
>
>
yes, s
We can also use $EDITOR to edit the URL address.
12:16 < pancake> (get uri, write in file, launch $EDITOR, set contents
of file in clipboard, set uri)
A cool thing would be to extrapolate this functionality to also edit
cookies and post data.
Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:15, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> There is a patch already for this (written by Gottox) which I consider
> to make mainstream as well for surf integration (apart from vertical
> items and an overhaul of the Key handling).
Hello, Anselm, can you describe why you don't want to
That's a *great* idea.
I don't really like to edit my url with dmenu anyway... liked the GTK
box better and I think editing it with vim would be a lot better than
GTK boxes.
Moritz
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:10:41PM +0100, pancake wrote:
> We can also use $EDITOR to edit the URL address.
>
> 12:
Methinks editing such a small thing like url with vim is a bit too much.
However, idea of editing postdata and cookies sounds really good to me.
Regards
On 20-11-2009 13:23:00, c...@wzff.de wrote:
> That's a *great* idea.
> I don't really like to edit my url with dmenu anyway... liked the GTK
> b
2009/11/20 Michael :
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 14:15, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> There is a patch already for this (written by Gottox) which I consider
>> to make mainstream as well for surf integration (apart from vertical
>> items and an overhaul of the Key handling).
>
> Hello, Anselm, can you de
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 15:47, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Aehm I was saying vertical will become mainstream...
Sorry, got to read more English. Happy to hear it, thanks.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:51:41 +0300
Michael wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 15:47, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > Aehm I was saying vertical will become mainstream...
>
> Sorry, got to read more English. Happy to hear it, thanks.
>
I also read the original message as "will take it upstream (but no
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
>>
>> I'm interested in math and CASs, but my opinions on available software
>> are ill-formed and mostly ignorant. Does anyone else here have an
>> interest in this topic, broadl
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
> Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
Fortran is nowadays seldom used, few people can tell if it "sucks in the
sense of suckless" (?).
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
>> Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
>
> As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
> Fortran is nowadays seldom used,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53:47PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> FWIW, my understanding is that the LAPACK library must have an API
> which conforms with a reference Fortran implementation, but there are
> various versions implemented in various languages (Fortran, C, CUDA,
> etc).
This is true. But
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53:47PM +, David Tweed wrote:
>> FWIW, my understanding is that the LAPACK library must have an API
>> which conforms with a reference Fortran implementation, but there are
>> various versions implemented in va
On 11/20/09, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
>> Anyone know of any suckless math software out there in the tubes?
>
> As for algebra, the king of the hill is without doubt LAPACK. But since
LAPACK is about floating point computations, it has n
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:57:24PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> I was pointing out more how the simple-minded software metrics would
> condemn you to around about the level of performance acheived by the
> reference LAPACK (white bars) in the paper referenced, which to my
> mind suggests there's a f
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:57:24PM +, David Tweed wrote:
>> I was pointing out more how the simple-minded software metrics would
>> condemn you to around about the level of performance acheived by the
>> reference LAPACK (white bars) in
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:56:07PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> I think it's just a difference in when we'd use words like terrible.
Well, being on a suckless list, I tend to agree with suckless' definitions
of "terrible".
Perhaps all this could be elaborated from a different angle. Most of the
pe
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 01:53:47PM +, David Tweed wrote:
As for the code "quality", I can see the code driving certain people
on this list mad because it deliberately doesn't compute things in the
simplest way and fewest lines in order to do things like acheive close
to optimal cache blocking
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:29:55PM -0800, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
>>
>> I see a gray "foo" string inside the first item in wmii9menu
>
> Works for me. Also, `hg grep -r tip foo` doesn't show any results.
Thanks for fixing this!
http://hg.suckl
> As a personal anecdote: I was reading a good book about numerical
> computation the other day. Everything was nicely derived and all that. But
> when it came to the C library that the respected professor had developed, I
> couldn't but think: this is absolutely terrifying. I mean, the code exampl
2009/11/20 Kris Maglione :
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:23:35PM -0600, A.J. Gardner wrote:
>>
>> I'm interested in math and CASs, but my opinions on available software
>> are ill-formed and mostly ignorant. Does anyone else here have an
>> interest in this topic, broadly speaking? If so, do you hav
Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:31:16PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
>> [2009-11-13 20:00] Yannic Haupenthal
>>>
>>> &>/dev/null
>>
>> Smells like bashism.
>>
>> Use
>>
>> >/dev/null 2>&1
>>
>> instead.
>
> It's actually a csh-ism. zsh does it, too, but I don't think bash d
On 11/20/09, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Why not? I think it should be possible to have very minimalist and
> specialized CAS', they managed to do that in the 50s and 60s, why not
> today?
>
ah good old reduce
31 matches
Mail list logo
