On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:25:43PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Hell, even MS's console font has ©, and has since the early DOS days.
Sure, that was even one of the first char they put in their fonts.
Yeah that seems to do the trick. As long as I stick to one monitor and
don't expect detached windows to remember their positions, it's not
too bad.
Cheers,
Alex
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Alex Matviychuk :
>> Sorry I should of been more clear. I can under
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:18:07 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
> wmii 3.9 Beta 1 has just been released.
Cool. I don't care about releases, but really appreciate that you fixed
almost (let me remind you that issue 22 still cries "Fix me!") all
major bugs recently.
--
Thomas Dahms
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:15:31AM +0200, Thomas Dahms wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:18:07 -0400
Kris Maglione wrote:
wmii 3.9 Beta 1 has just been released.
Cool. I don't care about releases, but really appreciate that you fixed
almost (let me remind you that issue 22 still cries "Fix me!")
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:09:25AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> It seems to me that the problems being discussed in this subthread arise
> because the "browser" combines two very distinct concerns:
>
> - managing the http traffic to and from the website, which includes the
> administrative det
i dont have this segfault in my archlinux 32 bits.
Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
Hi,
I updated my arch-system one minute ago and surf seems to segfault with
the newest webkit (1.1.15.3).
I recompiled the newest surf from hg, and the same happens.
GDB said:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentati
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:07:03PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> This whole thread is stupid: the complaint about UTF-8 chars is
> stupid, and the "copyright notice" is stupid.
>
> A simple mention in the readme like: "This code is released to the
> public domain and under the MIT and ISC licenses, pick w
Should do a 9p file server with some kind of cookie and session cache,
also precache.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:09:25AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> It seems to me that the problems being discussed in this subthread arise
>> because
Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 à 02:44:53, Tadeusz Sośnierz a écrit :
> Hello,
> I wrote some patch for bookmark handling, attached. Everything is driven
> by the right-click menu. Sadly, I had no idea how to include some labels
> for the urls. Also, I'm rather beggining with C, so I'm sorry for any
> ey
On 23-10-2009 19:26:50, Julien Pecqueur wrote:
> Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 à 02:44:53, Tadeusz Sośnierz a écrit :
> > Hello,
> > I wrote some patch for bookmark handling, attached. Everything is driven
> > by the right-click menu. Sadly, I had no idea how to include some labels
> > for the urls. Als
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:12:08PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> Should do a 9p file server with some kind of cookie and session cache,
> also precache.
using 9p for surf sounds great. This way it should be simple to share data
between multiple surf windows
Regards
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/21 Uriel :
>> Surf should *not* handle downloads or display source, this are clearly
>> and obviously best handled by external tools and there is zero reason
>> for them to be part of any browser.
>
> I disagree with downloads, becau
12 matches
Mail list logo
