Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

2009/9/13 Kurt H Maier : > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently >> introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? > > It's crucial for monocle, but wastes space in other layouts. > crucial? i ha

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009/9/14 Amit Uttamchandani : > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:26:55PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote: >> And for your delectation: Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of >> suckless.org >>

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 08:38:41PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently > introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? I usually know exactly how many clients I have opened. But in any case, I don't know how this number c

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, yy wrote: > 2009/9/13 Kurt H Maier : >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >>> Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently >>> introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? >> >> It's crucial for monocle,

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

* Anders Andersson [2009-09-14 10:19]: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, yy wrote: > > 2009/9/13 Kurt H Maier : > >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > >>> Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently > >>> introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

This discussion makes me think the best solution is extending the layout with an extra info function pointer that is called if non-NULL and printed to the bar (whatever that returns). Or to replace Layout->symbol with a function pointer... Kind regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:25 AM, yy wrote: > crucial? i have not updated dwm to any version with the counter yet > and have never felt the need for it. > may i suggest to use only a little indicator in monocle mode to > indicate that there are more clients? drawsquare could do the job. I use surf

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

No HTML email, please. And for your delectation: http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Conversation-with-Anselm-R.-Garbe-of-suckless.org.html&Itemid=29";>Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org -- Jack J. Woehr# «'I know what "it" means well enough,

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:26:55PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote: >> And for your delectation: Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of >> suckless.org >>

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/9/14 Amit Uttamchandani : >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:26:55PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote: >>> And for your delectation: Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of >>> suckless.org >>>

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

2009/9/14 Kurt H Maier : > I use surf, and multiple windows in monocle mode have taken the place > of browser tabs.  I know *if* I have a window open; the square woun't > tell me whether I have five or fifty. > so what? eventually, you will have to cycle through all your windows until you find the

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

> This is one of most important lessons, and most often forgotten, in > the history of programming. Fred Brooks mentioned it in The Mythical > Man Month (which should be one of three books every programmer knows > by heart), and was repeated again by Pike and Kernighan in the > Practice of Programm

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 01:44:57PM -0700, Thayer Williams wrote: > It's a nice feature for monocle mode, but I admit I don't see a reason > for it in any other mode. If it's not kept for monocle mode, I'll just > go back to using the monocle count patch. +1 Ciao, Leonardo -- Leonardo Taccari |

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

Anselm R Garbe wrote: 2009/9/14 Amit Uttamchandani : My question is that, there are some approaches that 'seem' easier/logical to implement with OO, how does one approach this in a not OO way? Well that was my excuse when I was a fan of OO as well, that there are plenty problems "bette

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:19 AM, yy wrote: > so what? eventually, you will have to cycle through all your windows > until you find the one you are looking for, the counter won't tell you > if it is in the position 5 or 50. Sorry my workflow's different than yours, I hope you can forgive me Let's

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:59:12AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > Just curious as to the arguments against OO programming. All the classes > > I have taken in uni always trumpet OO. I have been using it ever since > > but I do agree that it can get out of hand at times. > > Let me paste some res

[dev] [surf] is this available to download something with surf?

Hello. I'm trying to use start using surf and i have question - is this available to download something with it? When I'm clicking on download link (eg. on RapidShare) nothing's happening. I can click on it bilion times, and the same. There is no documentation (or I can't find it), so please, ans

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

2009/9/14 Amit Uttamchandani : > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:59:12AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> > Just curious as to the arguments against OO programming. All the classes >> > I have taken in uni always trumpet OO. I have been using it ever since >> > but I do agree that it can get out of hand

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

2009/9/14 Kurt H Maier : > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:19 AM, yy wrote: >> so what? eventually, you will have to cycle through all your windows >> until you find the one you are looking for, the counter won't tell you >> if it is in the position 5 or 50. > > Sorry my workflow's different than yours,

Re: [dev] [surf] is this available to download something with surf?

Le lundi 14 septembre 2009 à 07:15:03, Slawomir Gonet a écrit : > Hello. > I'm trying to use start using surf and i have question - is this available to > download something with it? > When I'm clicking on download link (eg. on RapidShare) nothing's happening. I > can click on it bilion times, an

Re: [dev] [surf] is this available to download something with surf?

Julien Pecqueur dixit (2009-09-14, 20:26): > Right click / download linked file... > > :) > Oh, thanks! Well, I'll try to use suckless way browser. But, Midori isn't bad at all.. pgp2JCSpT67ym.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

Sorry Anselm, I forgot to thank you for your quick answer. 1. I designed a software to automate testing of the boxes that we build. The main language used is Python (I guess it's hard to avoid OO when using python). Basically the design is such that I have a test case class that is used wh

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On 9/14/09, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Don't worry, I plan to make symbol a function pointer and then the > layout implementor can return whatever he likes as indicator. [M] > might become [%d]... if the monitor struct had a char ntext[8] member then the layout algorithm could set it (the layout str

Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Amit Uttamchandani wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:59:12AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> > Just curious as to the arguments against OO programming. All the classes >> > I have taken in uni always trumpet OO. I have been using it ever since >> > but I do agree