Hi,
this with xinerama support disabled:
dwm.c: In function ‘updategeom’:
dwm.c:1686: warning: unused variable ‘nn’
It should be declared inside the #ifdef XINERAMA block.
FWIW, I have no problems at all with dwm. I Couldn't image a better way to deal
with my X clients. I'm not
Hi Anselm,
Sorry if this questions were already answered before.
Why depend on xinerama for multihead setups instead of randr?
I though xinerama uses software and randr uses hardware, isn't that
supposed to be more optimal?
Is there a nice CLI tool for xinerama like xrandr for randr?
If not, s
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James PIC wrote:
> I though xinerama uses software and randr uses hardware, isn't that
> supposed to be more optimal?
>
PS: Subquestion: wouldn't it have required less source diff?
2009/7/27 Claudio M. Alessi :
> this with xinerama support disabled:
>
> dwm.c: In function ‘updategeom’:
> dwm.c:1686: warning: unused variable ‘nn’
>
> It should be declared inside the #ifdef XINERAMA block.
>
> FWIW, I have no problems at all with dwm. I Couldn't image a better way
2009/7/27 James PIC :
> Why depend on xinerama for multihead setups instead of randr?
Xrandr(3) doesn't provide a simple interface to manage multiple
screens, Xinerama(3) is much more convenient and much simpler as well.
If Xrandr(3) is changed accordingly to provide a similiar simple
interface, I
