[dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Kupai József
Hello, I have a problem with DWM. I start Xterm with Mod1-Shift-Return. When I press these buttons sometime Xterm does not start. I hear only a Beep, but there is no more Xterm window. In average I have to press Mod1-Shift-Return five times to open an Xterm terminal. This is the same in wmii and i

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/17 Kupai József : > I have a problem with DWM. > I start Xterm with Mod1-Shift-Return. When I press these buttons sometime > Xterm does not start. > I hear only a Beep, but there is no more Xterm window. In average I have to > press Mod1-Shift-Return five times to open an Xterm terminal. > T

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Mate Nagy
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:32:26AM +, Kupai József wrote: Hiho, > I have a problem with DWM. > I start Xterm with Mod1-Shift-Return. When I press these buttons sometime > Xterm does not start. > I hear only a Beep, but there is no more Xterm window. In average I have to > press Mod1-Shift-Retur

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Arun G Nair
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 7/16/09, Arun G Nair wrote: > > I have had a problem since 5.5. And its still there in 5.6. If I try to > move > > the mplayer window its starts to resize and gets smaller and smaller. Am > > using Alt + Right mouse button to do this. I

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/17/09, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 7/16/09, Arun G Nair wrote: >> I have had a problem since 5.5. And its still there in 5.6. If I try to >> move >> the mplayer window its starts to resize and gets smaller and smaller. Am >> using Alt + Right mouse button to do this. I've commented out > > i'v

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/17/09, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > it turns out the result of those inequalities depend on compiler > optimization flags (compiler might choose to use double division and > comparison instead of float one) so with -O0 there are no updates, > with -Os there are always updates unless the aspect is a

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Arun G Nair
2009/7/17 Tadzik Sośnierz > Dnia 2009-07-17, o godz. 00:21:51 > Arun G Nair napisał(a): > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Arun G Nair > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Anselm R Garbe > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi there, > > >> > > >> I'm glad to announce th

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Kupai József
I start dwm with the dwm command after I killed twm. I have no ~/.xsession-errors On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Mate Nagy wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:32:26AM +, Kupai József wrote: > Hiho, > > I have a problem with DWM. > > I start Xterm with Mod1-Shift-Return. When I press these

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Anselm R Garbe
2009/7/17 Kupai József : > I start dwm with the dwm command after I killed twm. > I have no ~/.xsession-errors There is some potential that some other X clients are running that grab certain keys, that's why I recommend you starting dwm straight away from .xinitrc and check if that makes a differe

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Mate Nagy
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:38:07PM +, Kupai József wrote: > I start dwm with the dwm command after I killed twm. > I have no ~/.xsession-errors ...rrighto. Try to launch an xterm, then try launching further xterms from that (from the same terminal command that's specified in your config.h). T

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Kupai József
Now dwm started by .xinitrc, but no difference. And the absence of the ~/.xsession-errors also fustrating. Regards, Joszef On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/7/17 Kupai József : > > I start dwm with the dwm command after I killed twm. > > I have no ~/.xsession-errors

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Kupai József
I have just realized its not xterm, its uxterm. However act the same as xterm. I have tried what you said, but it gives no any error messages. I think the new xterm window terminates immediately, because I see the new window for a very short period. Do you have any idea where to search for error m

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/17/09, Kupai József wrote: > Do you have any idea where to search for error messages? And where is my eg start dwm in .xinitrc with dwm 2> ~/dwm.error.log but first try starting uxterm and xterm from a terminal and see if that works you might also want to try to start them from .xinitrc wi

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Preben Randhol
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:51:35 +0200 Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 7/17/09, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > it turns out the result of those inequalities depend on compiler > > optimization flags (compiler might choose to use double division and > > comparison instead of float one) so with -O0 there are no u

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Alexander Polakov
2009/7/17, Kupai József : > I have just realized its not xterm, its uxterm. However act the same as > xterm. > I have tried what you said, but it gives no any error messages. I think the > new xterm window terminates immediately, because I see the new window for a > very short period. > > Do you ha

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/17/09, Preben Randhol wrote: > (float)*w/(float)*h != (float) (w/h) in most cases also... this expression won't even compile: dereference is only allowed for pointers division for numbers if you meant (float)w/h != (float)(w/h) with int w,h, then you are right, the former is floating point

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009-07-17 Thread Preben Randhol
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:51:47 +0200 Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > my problem was that it seems that c and ieee754 does not even require > that the arithmetic operations are well defined: same operation on > same numbers with same type does not necessary give the same result > (even on same architecture w

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Preben Randhol
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:35:46 + Alexander Polakov wrote: > Take a look at dmesg, and make a search for .core files. > or syslog, x11 logs, auth logs etc...

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-17 Thread Dave Heistand
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Francois Gombault wrote: > Hi there, > > First of all, I got to say thank you to Anselm and the contributors to > dwm, which truly is a wonder. Yes, thanks to them, and also to the patch contributors, I find bstack very useful. Does anyone happen to know

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-17 Thread Scytrin dai Kinthra
I have a functional patch for nmaster 5.4 but I haven't seen about migrating as gapless grid is meeting my laptop requirements and my desktop is still on 5.4 On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:46, Dave Heistand wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Francois Gombault wrote: >> Hi there, >> >>

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-17 Thread Scytrin dai Kinthra
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 14:04, Scytrin dai Kinthra wrote: > I have a functional patch for nmaster 5.4 but I haven't seen about > migrating as gapless grid is meeting my laptop requirements and my > desktop is still on 5.4 > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:46, Dave Heistand wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 20

Re: [dev] DWM problem

2009-07-17 Thread Kupai József
I solved the problem. I rebuilt dwm without uxterm (now with xterm), and it works. I think uxterm missed some UTF things, but I dont really understand why it even started sometimes. /// Sorry for my english. Regards, Jozsef On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/7/17 Kup

Re: OT: Re: [dev] mention suckless favorably in today's blog article A Quantum of Computing

2009-07-17 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2009-07-14, 20:39): > > perhaps not intuitively, but I also remember an IBM boss claiming 5 > > computers would be sufficient for the world back in the good ol' days. > > actually that is a hoax, thomas j watson probably never said it > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_J._

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-17 Thread Mate Nagy
Hiho, > Yes, thanks to them, and also to the patch contributors, I find bstack > very useful. Does anyone happen to know if there's an nmaster patch for > 5.6? It appears the last one is from 4.7 (2007). http://port70.net/~kzed/dwm-5.6/ batteries not included / ymmv. worksforme, though Best r