On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:49:13 -0500
Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Preben Randhol
> wrote:
> > So what you are saying is that if a problem is making the code more
> > complex one define that this is not a problem and ignore it?
>
> Yes.
Hope you are not doing any real lif
2009/7/11 Jack Woehr :
> I mention suckless favorably in today's blog article A Quantum of Computing
>
> You folks are the greatest.
I'm glad having read your article ;)
Kind regards,
Anselm
2009/7/11 yy :
> 2009/7/11 Szabolcs Nagy :
>> * applyrule()+arrange() is called whenever client title changes
>
> +1, but only if the client has no tags yet.
Yes there'll be a dirty flag for clients, so that rules are applied as
long as it's clean.
Kind regards,
Anselm
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:22:47PM +0100, Kevin Nagel wrote:
> I am a wmii-2.5 user and like the tabbing concept much more than the
> stacking concept in wmii-3. However, I've considered using dwm, but
> would like to have these features there as well. Also the dynamic
> control of creating/deleti
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Hope you are not doing any real life coding...
Sorry to dash your hopes.
> So per-tag is weird and bizarre? Not that every time one go to tag
> X one need to press Modx-M and then when returning to tag Y you have to
> press Modx-t? Out of 3
