> This is the suckless community you're talking about.
> If somebody raises a support question without providing a patch,
> the first five replies will usually tell him to write a patch.
> Code and philosophical "development" questions go hand in hand
> in this community, so I'm unsure how to draw
Hey everyone,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:22:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> 1.) There is now a news@ mailinglist for package maintainers who don’t
> want to follow the discussions on dev@. All new releases should be an‐
> nounced there and on dev@.
Makes sense. Thank you for that.
> 2
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:22:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades.
>
> We (the suckless admins) decided about some additional bureaucracy to
> make the suckless development more followable:
>
> 1.) There is now a news@ mailinglist for package maintainers who don’t
> wan
Let me point out that I am still receiving this list on this mail
address, even though I am unsubscribed?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:15 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes! Now that you have a mailing list with rules we can finally wreak
> havoc here.
Yess! At last we have proper rules we can break!11!!
Yes! Now that you have a mailing list with rules we can finally wreak
havoc here.
On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:22:00 +0200
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
Hey Christoph,
> These changes will keep the development out of the endless support
> threads on dev@ and development more enjoyable.
I really appreciate this! Let's hope people follow the rules as well ...
Cheers
> 2.) The purpose of hackers@ has been redefined that new
> patches for projects have to be sent and discussed there.
>
> These changes will keep the development out of the endless support
> threads on dev@ and development more enjoyable.
Sounds great to me, thanks for this, I've subs
