Re: [dev] Re: Migration to git

2012-11-29 Thread pancake
Maybe it would be easier if we just write our own suckless git frontend using libgit2. Without getoptlong and other monsters. Just design a suckless workflow and implement it in a suckless tool. I guess this tool can be also written in shellscript as a wrapper to git. Btw, nobody commented this

Re: [dev] Re: Migration to git

2012-11-29 Thread Sam Watkins
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 06:18:25PM +0100, pancake wrote: > definitively, git sucks I could have told you that! lol Mercurial is obviously much, much cleaner and simpler than git. There's a reason why the suckless / cat-v / bell / google guys are using it. Oh, wait... The basic git system is rea

Re: [dev] Re: Migration to git

2012-11-29 Thread pancake
definitively, git sucks On 11/29/12 17:59, Christoph Lohmann wrote: Greetings. On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:59:57 +0100 Christian Neukirchen wrote: pancake writes: the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running "git update-server-info" after every commit? this is used to update the htt

Re: [dev] Re: Migration to git

2012-11-29 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:59:57 +0100 Christian Neukirchen wrote: > pancake writes: > > > the http support in git is a hack. are you guys running "git > > update-server-info" > > after every commit? this is used to update the http information with > > the .git > > database.. > > man g