On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 11:15:11AM +0200, hiro wrote:
> is C++ worse than glibc? (i would weight also by how much you can avoid it...)
c++ with its libsdc++ is orders of magnitude worse than the glibc with a c
compiler.
It's like comparing lynx/links to chromium/firefox.
Thx for the troll btw, :
is C++ worse than glibc? (i would weight also by how much you can avoid it...)
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I did already say that, but remember that C compilers are being kind
> > of phased out by force:
> >
> >- many "standard"/critical applications and even system components
> > are forcing modern c++.
>
> Fo
> Hi,
Hi,
> I did already say that, but remember that C compilers are being kind
> of phased out by force:
>
>- many "standard"/critical applications and even system components
> are forcing modern c++.
For example?
>- modern c++ can only be compiled with a modern c++
> compiler/runtim
Hi,
I did already say that, but remember that C compilers are being kind of phased
out by force:
- many "standard"/critical applications and even system components are
forcing modern c++.
- modern c++ can only be compiled with a modern c++ compiler/runtime.
It's very sad, but above all i
plumb: can't send message: couldn't find destination for message
> [1] gopher://bitreich.org
> [2] gopher://bitreich.org/1/scm/scc/log.gph
sed 'gopher:/,https://gopherproxy.meulie.net,'
sucks, but works.
s.
Hi Roberto,
On 9 August 2017 at 21:12, Roberto E. Vargas wrote:
> A lot of different things happened since that moment, some of
> them in my life, and some of them in the suckless community.
> Due to these changes, I don't feel scc as a suckless project
> anymore, and as project founder, main con
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:12:45PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas wrote:
> After this mail, the new official community where scc is going
> to be developed is bitreich [1], and you can find the new
> repository in [2].
Sad to see it go but I will still follow its development if I find
the time!
Cheers
