Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-23 Thread clamiax
Hi, 2012/2/22 Connor Lane Smith : > I think we can agree that the "maximize vertical/horizontal patch" > should be on a separate page, but what I don't understand is why > you're emailing this mailing list. Clearly either you should make the > change, or you should email Jan (whose email is availa

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 22 February 2012 14:19, clamiax wrote: > This mean people can put any kind of patch on suckless.org regardless > if it comply with our phylosophy or not (and place it above that which > comply instead). Ok, I just learned a new rule. I think we can agree that the "maximize vertical/horiz

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread Rob
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:19:28PM +0100, clamiax wrote: > That's most likely due to your wrong workflow, which includes moving X > clients between monitors. I'm not complain about multi-head setup, I'm > just telling you that moving windows between monitor without any kind > of criteria is a flaw

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread clamiax
2012/2/22 Rob : > I don't agree, I like moving windows with the keyboard, and the > cross-monitor thing was bugging me That's most likely due to your wrong workflow, which includes moving X clients between monitors. I'm not complain about multi-head setup, I'm just telling you that moving windows b

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread Rob
On 22 February 2012 08:58, clamiax wrote: > I'm here to discuss about the change *before* make it, since most > people may not agree with me. I don't agree, I like moving windows with the keyboard, and the cross-monitor thing was bugging me >> The 6.0 patches do look ok from my point of view. >

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread clamiax
Hi, 2012/2/21 Anselm R Garbe : > It's a wiki after all and it would be quicker to fix the sites yourself. I'm here to discuss about the change *before* make it, since most people may not agree with me. Also I will not waste my time fixing other people defacements; nor I should. > The 6.0 patches

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 21 February 2012 09:57, clamiax wrote: > it would be nice if Jan Christoph Ebersbach would remove its garbage > along with all unreachable URLs from the moveresize patch page to its > own page, maybe maximize_vert_horz, which have nothing to do with > moveresize. Also it would be great to move