On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:16:49AM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> ---
>>
>> The first version broke some functionality. This one doesn't by doing
>> some more ugly checking.
>>
>> We also make sure that we include the newline by using text
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:16:49AM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> ---
>
> The first version broke some functionality. This one doesn't by doing
> some more ugly checking.
>
> We also make sure that we include the newline by using text_line_next
> instead of text_line_finish.
>
> vis.c | 6 +-
