Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> what would a "javascript download" be?
I confess to not having looked in depth at all the nasty obfuscated
ways javascript heavy sites 'protect' downloads. But Carlos in the
original version of the patch refers to "javascript that generates
POST requests".
I thing the
Quoth Nick:
> In other surf news, I created a page on the wiki
> http://surf.suckless.org/failing_sites - if anyone finds something
> that doesn't work in surf, please detail it there (or on the mailing
> list). While surf is very far from perfect, it's the most reasonable
> way of using today's
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:51:10PM +0100, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> > Nick writes:
> >
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
> > > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
> > > than relying on e.g. wg
On 2011-09-28 14:51, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> > Nick writes:
> > Huh? I have not had trouble using wget for this.
> Can anyone else confirm / deny this?
Not for those sites, however I did see enough fails to add the same to
https://github.com/patrickhaller/surf-ph
Patrick
Nick writes:
> In other surf news, I created a page on the wiki
> http://surf.suckless.org/failing_sites - if anyone finds something
> that doesn't work in surf, please detail it there (or on the mailing
> list). While surf is very far from perfect, it's the most reasonable
> way of using toda
Nick writes:
> Quoth Troels Henriksen:
>> Nick writes:
>>
>> > Howdy,
>> >
>> > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
>> > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
>> > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
>>
Quoth Troels Henriksen:
> Nick writes:
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
> > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
> > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
> > isn't, as it's needed f
Nick writes:
> Howdy,
>
> I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in
> July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather
> than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it
> isn't, as it's needed for horrible javascript sorts of download
