On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 06:32:15AM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> The C preprocessor has been pretty much ignored by any decent C
> programmer for decades now, getting rid of it in Go is a non-issue.
It was not ignored. sys/queue.h is very useful
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Uriel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dmitry Maluka
> wrote:
> You don't need to replace something that is useless and evil, as Go
> shows. Just like Plan 9 didn't "replace" root and suid (or at least
> not directly).
>
> The C preprocessor has been p
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:47:46AM +, Aled Gest wrote:
>> I totally agree that the C pre-processor sucks. It's ill thought out
>> and needs replacing.
>
> Any proposals?
You don't need to replace something that is useless and evil, as G
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 03:47:46AM +, Aled Gest wrote:
> I totally agree that the C pre-processor sucks. It's ill thought out
> and needs replacing.
Any proposals?
> However, going back to what you were saying about
> you being able to subdue Lisp's syntax with macros, any language that
> req
