Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-12 Thread Strake
On 12/11/2013, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Strake wrote: > ... >> for an actual fault, for example a bottom post, is no flame. >> > > Logical fallacies that are obvious are an edge case, I guess... It's > top posting we don't like. Sorry, yes, I meant top post.

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-12 Thread Martti Kühne
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Strake wrote: ... > for an actual fault, for example a bottom post, is no flame. > Logical fallacies that are obvious are an edge case, I guess... It's top posting we don't like. cheers! mar77i

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-07 Thread Strake
"Asshole vs. reality" would be an appropriate subtitle for "suckless: the movie". Alas, the list smells ever of phosphorus and kerosene, as some would rather flame than argue rationally. But slamming someone for an actual fault, for example a bottom post, is no flame.

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-07 Thread FRIGN
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:32:46 +0100 koneu wrote: > Maybe suckless.org should host a netiquette mailing list to get all this > off topic out of [dev] ... > ML-fragmentation has been discussed before (especially in regard to stali) and dismissed. For the sake of specificity though, I wouldn't have

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-07 Thread koneu
Mihail Zenkov wrote: > 2013/11/6, koneu : > > I agree with you on implicit "hi" and "bye" in mailing lists but please > > don't fucking bot quote. And if gmail's fucking online shit doesn't > > allow anything else then don't fucking use gmail's fucking online shit. > > Thanks. > > +1 But can we wr

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-07 Thread Mihail Zenkov
2013/11/6, koneu : > I agree with you on implicit "hi" and "bye" in mailing lists but please > don't fucking bot quote. And if gmail's fucking online shit doesn't > allow anything else then don't fucking use gmail's fucking online shit. > Thanks. +1 But can we write in less aggressive style withou

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-06 Thread Krol, Willem van de
> Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h] I should have never asked...

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-06 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: >> What does it make you feel that I do not append a salutation and closing >> to this e-mail? Does it bother you in any way? If so, why? If not, why >> should I do so? > >This is not twitter. He has a point, and this discussion is related to usage of this

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-06 Thread koneu
hiro wrote: > You're so deep. I agree with you on implicit "hi" and "bye" in mailing lists but please don't fucking bot quote. And if gmail's fucking online shit doesn't allow anything else then don't fucking use gmail's fucking online shit. Thanks.

Re: Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-06 Thread hiro
You're so deep. On 11/6/13, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > Greetings. > > On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:48:22 +0100 Chris Down wrote: >> On 2013-11-06 06:38:23 +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: >> > You have nothing to say, I guess. >> >> What does it make you feel that I do not append a salut

Asshole vs. reality [was: Re: [dev] Question about arg.h]

2013-11-06 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:48:22 +0100 Chris Down wrote: > On 2013-11-06 06:38:23 +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > You have nothing to say, I guess. > > What does it make you feel that I do not append a salutation and closing > to this e-mail? Does it bother you in any way? If so, why?