On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> My two cents...
> Granted that rc+mk are far superior to /bin/sh+GNU make, but if there
> are already 3rd party (i.e. not from suckless) packages/programs that
> depend on sh+gmake, you might as well just use them as is. Doing a
> whole lot of
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Anselm R Garbe
> wrote:
> > Nevertheless, after an excursion to sh for several years, I'm kind of
> > favouring 9base/rc again, after all. For stali I now tend to adopt rc
> > as primary scripting language for
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Nevertheless, after an excursion to sh for several years, I'm kind of
> favouring 9base/rc again, after all. For stali I now tend to adopt rc
> as primary scripting language for the target system as well. For the
> build host environment I w
