On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:12:41 +0200
"a.l.e" wrote:
> one first sorrow: the goal of dwm-sprinkles is to add all the
> available patches...
>
No, definitely not :)
> i would be happier to some of them... plus a few which i would not use
> but other think are important.
>
I intend to make some patc
hi fernando,
> > this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to
> > keep track of versions of dwm and of the patches i have applied.
>
> I've been using dwm-sprinkles, it's a nice mashup of patches and
> maintained up to date.
>
> http://0mark.unserver.de/projects/dwm-sprink
Hey,
On 27 June 2011 08:13, a.l.e wrote:
> this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to keep track
> of versions of dwm and of the patches i have applied.
I can't help but think that the solution would be not to apply
patches. You don't really need to.
> at least: dynamic t
2011/6/27 a.l.e :
> this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to keep track
> of
> versions of dwm and of the patches i have applied.
I've been using dwm-sprinkles, it's a nice mashup of patches and
maintained up to date.
http://0mark.unserver.de/projects/dwm-sprinkles/
--
hi,
Also, I applied the 'pertag' patch and maybe another one that I can't
remember right now. How can I diff my local version against tip? Sorry am
more of a git user.
this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to keep
track of versions of dwm and of the patches i have appl
