Re: [dev] stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-14 Thread Claudio M. Alessi
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0200, pancake wrote: > I wrote tac in 9base a week ago... I would really prefer 9base before other > alternatives if we can choose. Most of them are valid replacements +1 I would prefer plan 9 userland againsts OpenBSD (where possible). After all it's a suckles

Re: [dev] stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-10 Thread pancake
I wrote tac in 9base a week ago... I would really prefer 9base before other alternatives if we can choose. Most of them are valid replacements - Original message - > `tac' is `tail -r' on BSD. > > `whoami' is `id -nu'. > > > meillo >

Re: [dev] stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-10 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:13 AM, finkler wrote: > And this is what is missing in OBSD: > chown having a hard time believing this -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-10 Thread markus schnalke
`tac' is `tail -r' on BSD. `whoami' is `id -nu'. meillo

Re: [dev] stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-10 Thread Jacob Todd
Head can be replaced with a script that calls `sed nq`, where n is positive integer. -- I am a man who does not exist for others. pgp4NBp73lSLw.pgp Description: PGP signature

[dev] stali and OpenBSD userland etc.

2010-04-10 Thread finkler
Hej there. I am eagerly anticipating advances in stali, and since updates are scarce I started to investigate in different matters of this kind and started to play with my humble attempt to create such a distro myself, just for fun. I read that the userland of stali is OpenBSD derived, I took the