On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Josuah Demangeon wrote:
> I am not disappointed when I see a simple ./configure script that generate a
> clean config.mk. Would something like this be acceptable to for a suckless
> project ?
>
> case "$(uname -a)" in
> *Linux* )
> XXXINC=/...
>
I am not disappointed when I see a simple ./configure script that generate a
clean config.mk. Would something like this be acceptable to for a suckless
project ?
case "$(uname -a)" in
*Linux* )
XXXINC=/...
;;
*OpenBSD* )
XXXINC=/...
;;
*FreeBSD* )
XXXINC=/...
;;
esac
te
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:58:41PM +, ra...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> one of the most widely reported sources of suck are the autotools that gives
> you the (in)ability to compile programs from source. ./configure, automake,
> autoconf, autoreconf, m4, intltool, libtoolize, etc.
>
> the best pr
one of the most widely reported sources of suck are the autotools that
gives you the (in)ability to compile programs from source. ./configure,
automake, autoconf, autoreconf, m4, intltool, libtoolize, etc.
the best practice used in suckless projects is generally to have a main
makefile that im
