On 12/09/2015 07:10 PM, Jan Klemkow wrote:
I committed your diff for presenced with a following clean up. But
maybe, I will change the presenced semantic a bit.
But for the moment I fixes the daemon in a very good way.
Thanks for your help!
My pleasure. Changing the semantics in what way?
I committed your diff for presenced with a following clean up. But
maybe, I will change the presenced semantic a bit.
But for the moment I fixes the daemon in a very good way.
Thanks for your help!
bye,
Jan
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 01:57:26PM -0500, Greg Reagle wrote:
> In this message, I point
Hi Greg,
presenced was the last daemon I wrote just before the slcon2. Its just
a short hack, that I didn't check to run correctly in real usage :-)
Thanks for the diffs. I'll have a look at them tonight. Because I am
busy now. But it looks good, beside of a few stylistic things.
bye,
Jan
O
I fixed the problem. I want to clean up and test my modification some
more before I submit it.
In this message, I point out the error and state the correct way of
receiving presence. FRIGN, please don't call me a help vampire. :> I
do plan to write the patch, but it might take me a little while.
Re: https://github.com/younix/sj
in presenced.c in recv_presence(), lines 254-255
stat
