Hey,
On 22 December 2011 22:35, anonymous wrote:
> Tiny cleanup patch. Now more memory is allocated than necessary.
Thanks for the patch, I've applied it to tip. Sorry for the delay, I
didn't notice this thread. ;)
cls
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:10:49PM -, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> >Tiny cleanup patch. Now more memory is allocated than necessary.
> Is that a good thing or a typo?
>
Now more memory is allocated than necessary, but after applying this
patch it will allocate just as much memory as required.
On 22 December 2011 23:10, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> Tiny cleanup patch. Now more memory is allocated than necessary.
>
> Is that a good thing or a typo?
Looking at the code, it appears to be a typo, now the exact amount
of memory is allocated
Rob
Tiny cleanup patch. Now more memory is allocated than necessary.
Is that a good thing or a typo?
Tiny cleanup patch. Now more memory is allocated than necessary.
diff -r dcb29ce4485f ls.c
--- a/ls.c Tue Nov 08 19:35:38 2011 +0100
+++ b/ls.c Fri Dec 23 02:34:01 2011 +0400
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
many = (argc > optind+1);
if((n = argc - optind) > 0) {
- if(!(
