On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:34:07PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I found them now. I didn't see any patches against tip on the
> > wiki page (with the other patches), and I thought that might have been
> > the intention. Do they ju
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Lieven Moors wrote:
>
> Ah, I found them now. I didn't see any patches against tip on the
> wiki page (with the other patches), and I thought that might have been
> the intention. Do they just need a link manually added to that page?
>
It's probably best to base t
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 05:22:42PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> > Would it make sense to keep latest out-of-tree patches in a git
> > repo? It's not a lot of work to keep them up to date, but on the other hand
> > I
> > guess many people d
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> Would it make sense to keep latest out-of-tree patches in a git
> repo? It's not a lot of work to keep them up to date, but on the other hand I
> guess many people do the same thing over and over again.
>
The out-of-tree patches are already i
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:00:36PM +0100, Lieven Moors wrote:
Would it make sense to keep latest out-of-tree patches in a git
repo? It's not a lot of work to keep them up to date, but on the other hand I
guess many people do the same thing over and over again.
Isn't this idea seems similar to
Hi,
Would it make sense to keep latest out-of-tree patches in a git
repo? It's not a lot of work to keep them up to date, but on the other hand I
guess many people do the same thing over and over again.
lieven
