Obligatory: http://xkcd.com/445/
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Seth Hover wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Stefan Mark wrote:
>> > This statement has some nice boomerang Irony.
>>
>> pretty amazing that you don't unde
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Stefan Mark wrote:
> > This statement has some nice boomerang Irony.
>
> pretty amazing that you don't understand boomerangs OR irony
>
>
i bought a boomerang once, and it didn't come back when i threw
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Stefan Mark wrote:
> This statement has some nice boomerang Irony.
pretty amazing that you don't understand boomerangs OR irony
On 29 December 2011 05:55, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC
> while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle.
>
> It's very popular[2] these days on the Arch Linux forums; try it out! :)
>
> [1]: https://bbs.
On 30.12.2011 21:35, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> I love arch linux's facility for coralling all the nitwits into one
> self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks
> out into the real world.
>
This statement has some nice boomerang Irony.
Happy new Year!! ;)
Manolo Martínez schrieb:
>On 12/31/11 at 12:02pm, Ryan Mullen wrote:
>> > crux is a linux distribution that I hate markedly less than some others,
>> > but it's got significant problems of its own -- specifically during
>> > installation. when they come up with a test regime
On 12/31/11 at 12:02pm, Ryan Mullen wrote:
> > crux is a linux distribution that I hate markedly less than some others,
> > but it's got significant problems of its own -- specifically during
> > installation. when they come up with a test regimen for their
> > perpetually-in-alpha 64-bit release
> crux is a linux distribution that I hate markedly less than some others,
> but it's got significant problems of its own -- specifically during
> installation. when they come up with a test regimen for their
> perpetually-in-alpha 64-bit release it will be worth another look.
FWIW I've been runn
OHAI,
> Gentoo sucks ina massive and ponderous way. There really isn't a
> 'good' linux distribution.
OpenBSD all the way down.
-Sime
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 05:47:24PM +0100, uki wrote:
> have you tried CRUX?
> it's small and less complicated than gentoo/debian (I wouldn't use
> word simple, for it still uses some of the more bloated gnu apps)
crux is a linux distribution that I hate markedly less than some others,
but it's got
have you tried CRUX?
it's small and less complicated than gentoo/debian (I wouldn't use
word simple, for it still uses some of the more bloated gnu apps)
Cheers,
Łukasz Gruner
2011/12/31 Kurt H Maier :
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:03:57AM +0100, Manolo Mart�nez wrote:
>>
>> Genuinely curious:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:03:57AM +0100, Manolo Mart�nez wrote:
>
> Genuinely curious: what's the suckless way to Linux then? Gentoo and Gentoo
> only?
>
Gentoo sucks ina massive and ponderous way. There really isn't a 'good'
linux distribution.
Dnia 31 grudnia 2011 10:03 Manolo Martínez
napisał(a):
> Genuinely curious: what's the suckless
> way to Linux then? Gentoo and Gentoo
> only?
Are you by any chance writing this using
wmii@ Ubuntu?
On 12/31/11, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 12/30/11 at 03:35pm, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> I love arch linux's facility for coralling all the nitwits into one
>> self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks
>> out into the real world.
>>
>> I think it would be better if it wer
On 12/30/11 at 03:35pm, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> I love arch linux's facility for coralling all the nitwits into one
> self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks
> out into the real world.
>
> I think it would be better if it were called Genbuntoo or something
> so ther
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Jason Dempsey wrote:
The elitism appears to be thick in here.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 16:56, Jason Dempsey wrote:
My it's stifling in here...must be all the egos.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 13:49, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
I love suckless' facility for coralling all the
The elitism appears to be thick in here.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 16:56, Jason Dempsey wrote:
> My it's stifling in here...must be all the egos.
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 13:49, Bjartur Thorlacius
> wrote:
>>> I love suckless' facility for coralling all the nitwits into one
>>>
>>> self-contai
I love suckless' facility for coralling all the nitwits into one
self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks
out into the real world.
T,FTFY
The real world is still safe. You're not.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 09:27:52PM +0100, Džen wrote:
> On 30/12/2011 11:38, hiro wrote:
> > Some critics are getting old and boring to me
>
> No surprise, since people come up with the same invalid statements
> day by day. And some won't understand it even after criticising them
> a thousand time
On 30/12/2011 11:38, hiro wrote:
Some critics are getting old and boring to me
No surprise, since people come up with the same invalid statements
day by day. And some won't understand it even after criticising them
a thousand times.
--
Džen
Some critics are getting old and boring to me
On Thu 29 Dec 2011 07:20:21 PM PST, Nick wrote:
> The Arch community [...] seem to have [...] uninformed people
> doing strange things in their midst. All good practise and
> experimentation and whathaveyou, but
It's a bazaar of artist/tinkerers sharing, learning, and having fun.
> can be annoyi
>
> first thing i noticed. kind of kills the functionality unless it has SOME
> kind of 'virtual desktop'/tag ability, unless you only use 1-3 windows at a
> time, EVER. looks like oversimplification at the expense of flexibility.
>
>
Oops, my bad. There is a 'desktops' function... but I prefer ta
Quoth Kurt H Maier:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 08:55:21PM -0800, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> > monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC
> > while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle.
>
> it doesn't do tagging at all, as far as I can tell.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>
>
> it doesn't do tagging at all, as far as I can tell.
>
first thing i noticed. kind of kills the functionality unless it has SOME
kind of 'virtual desktop'/tag ability, unless you only use 1-3 windows at a
time, EVER. looks like oversimpli
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 08:55:21PM -0800, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC
> while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle.
it doesn't do tagging at all, as far as I can tell.
> It's very popular[2] these d
monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC
while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle.
It's very popular[2] these days on the Arch Linux forums; try it out! :)
[1]: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=132122
[2]: https://bbs.archlinu
27 matches
Mail list logo
