Re: [dev] dwm systray diff for 6.1 fails.

2016-09-22 Thread Nick Warne
On Sep 22 2016, Eric Pruitt wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:48:51PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: Was going to use this to monitor battery, but HUNK #10 fails - looking at the patch and dwm.c, the code is totally different at around line 664: Are you using the tagged 6.1 release or 6.1/HEAD? My

Re: [dev] dwm systray diff for 6.1 fails.

2016-09-21 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:48:51PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: > Was going to use this to monitor battery, but HUNK #10 fails - looking > at the patch and dwm.c, the code is totally different at around line > 664: Are you using the tagged 6.1 release or 6.1/HEAD? My version of the patch applies clean

Re: [dev] dwm systray diff for 6.1 fails.

2016-09-21 Thread Britton Kerin
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Nick Warne wrote: > Hi all, > > Was going to use this to monitor battery, but HUNK #10 fails - looking > at the patch and dwm.c, the code is totally different at around line > 664: > > Hunk #7 succeeded at 292. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 516. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 566

[dev] dwm systray diff for 6.1 fails.

2016-09-21 Thread Nick Warne
Hi all, Was going to use this to monitor battery, but HUNK #10 fails - looking at the patch and dwm.c, the code is totally different at around line 664: Hunk #7 succeeded at 292. Hunk #8 succeeded at 516. Hunk #9 succeeded at 566. Hunk #10 FAILED at 664. Hunk #11 succeeded at 744 (offset -5 lines