NRK writes:
> I had bought up this issue in the past and the conclusion was that there
> should just be a comment added [0] as users are treated as programmers.
>
> [0]: https://lists.suckless.org/hackers/2208/18484.html
>
> - NRK
>
I should have read the archives before emailing.
Thanks for the
> I had bought up this issue in the past and the conclusion was that there
> should just be a comment added [0] as users are treated as programmers.
>
> [0]: https://lists.suckless.org/hackers/2208/18484.html
>
So be it! :-)
A user report is a good reason for adding the comment.
--
Best Regards,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:10:19PM +, Tom Schwindl wrote:
> However, a length check & truncation
> of the last char doesn't seem harmful at all. Thoughts?
I had bought up this issue in the past and the conclusion was that there
should just be a comment added [0] as users are treated as program
Hi,
On Tue Oct 25, 2022 at 5:03 PM CEST, spaceman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While compiling dwm on slackware 15 I get the following (with
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3):
And therein lies the catch. The call to strncpy(3) copies the symbol of the
currently selected layout to the layout symbol (ltsymbol) which will
Hi,
While compiling dwm on slackware 15 I get the following (with
_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3):
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:519,
from dwm.c:29:
In function 'strncpy',
inlined from 'arrangemon' at dwm.c:400:2,
inlined from 'arrange' at dwm.c:394:3,
inlined from
