@marc: i use ed in scripts.
Nobody uses ed ;)
Jokes aside, I'll be looking forward to it.
Have a nice one, see you around.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:20 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:12:47 -0200
> Marc Collin wrote:
>
> Hey Marc,
>
>> I discovered a way to read the thread that makes it actually enjoyable.
>> h
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:12:47 -0200
Marc Collin wrote:
Hey Marc,
> I discovered a way to read the thread that makes it actually enjoyable.
> http://bbs.progrider.org/prog/read/1447711906/1,35,41,48,51,52,54,60
> Looks suckless and the end goals are similar with yours, I think.
> Can't wait for a
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:11 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:52:59 -0200
> I'm already half-done with a suckless bignum-library. thanks for
> pointing to the thread, but these guys are mostly talk and no do.
> I bet the day when they reach consensus I'm going to offer
> enterprise suppo
I already wrote one, but i end up wrapping gmp and openssl for performance
reasons. Just check the source of r2 libr/util/big.c if you are interested
> On 18 Nov 2015, at 00:16, Marc Collin wrote:
>
> That's cool, didn't know you had one in the works.
> Mind telling a bit about it works? Mayb
That's cool, didn't know you had one in the works.
Mind telling a bit about it works? Maybe the source code is coming soon?
I'll let they know so no duplicated effort is done. Contributing to
what you have is surely a better decision now.
Have a nice one.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:11 PM, FRIGN w
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:52:59 -0200
Marc Collin wrote:
Hey Marc,
> There's an ongoing discussion on designing a suckless bignum library
> here: http://bbs.progrider.org/prog/read/1447711906
> Drop in when you have some time to discuss it.
>
> Have a nice one.
I'm already half-done with a suckle
There's an ongoing discussion on designing a suckless bignum library
here: http://bbs.progrider.org/prog/read/1447711906
Drop in when you have some time to discuss it.
Have a nice one.
