> That said, for the software of equal interest both to programmers and the
> rest of computer users, the very fact that developer doesn't use own product
> should hint that this product should not be used by the others.
sounds fair.
btw, sorry for making people philosophize so much about software
On Jun 11, 2013 5:30 PM, "hiro" <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just because I do indeed have empathy with this stupid planet's
> population I'd rather have people stop writing software commonly made
> for other people or for another greater good. Nobody needs software to
> fuck up their lives that muc
On 6/11/13, Andrew Hills wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:09:10 +0200 hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Only create software that you would want to use yourself, everything
>> else is a waste of time.
>
> This is bad advice, perhaps just because, like most snappy mantras,
> it's a gross oversimplif
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:09:10 +0200 hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Only create software that you would want to use yourself, everything
> else is a waste of time.
This is bad advice, perhaps just because, like most snappy mantras,
it's a gross oversimplification of reality. Some non-developers ne
Good software is not measured in number of patches either.
Only create software that you would want to use yourself, everything
else is a waste of time.
yep, its development is totally stalled and nobody is spending any
minimal effort to enhace it.
it works, for pop3, imap and smtp support via msmtp. But, like swk,
if no one shows interest on it, there's probably no reason to continue
developing it.
what sucks of dmc is the lack of feedback and
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:43:40AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> maybe one day, someone will look at dmc
I looked and went "this doesn't seem to work". I approve of the basic
idea.
Specifically my attempts to ls after setting up an account just do:
mstevens@ceres:~/dmc/doc % dmc -c ls
-(out)-> (null)
maybe one day, someone will look at dmc
Uli Armbruster writes:
> * Andrew Hills [10.06.2013 19:20]:
>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens
>> wrote:
>> > Are there any mail clients that don't suck?
>>
>> Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck.
>
> In case you don't instantly see this in Cl
