Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I will transform this list to a moderated one, if the spamming and > trolling persists at current levels. The whining about the trolling is worse than the trolling itself. The original poster had a good point: the suckless name SUCKS. Sti

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-11 Thread Jacob Todd
. On Aug 11, 2012 7:35 PM, wrote: > > bottom posting goes away. > >

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-11 Thread sl
> bottom posting goes away.

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-11 Thread hiro
lets start this democratic name finding game again. nominations: 10kloc, 20kloc, troll, dwm, 9base, dev, offtopic, slightly-offtopic, slightly-offtopic-but-troll. but the most important part for me is moderation, so that html mails, viruses, illegal content and bottom posting goes away.

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-11 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:01:48 +0200 Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I will transform this list to a moderated one, if the spamming and > trolling persists at current levels. > > -Anselm How about a split as there was before, so it is easy to move trolling into that mailinglist? tr...@suck

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-11 Thread Anselm R Garbe
I will transform this list to a moderated one, if the spamming and trolling persists at current levels. -Anselm

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-11 Thread hiro
some h4xx0r troll has managed to crack the captcha and got multiple mail accounts to spam us. Mark V. Shaney got outsourced to a chinese cloud service factory. They also replaced the monkeys with child labour. Please consider these sad creature's suffering and only buy fair-trade cloud services!

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-10 Thread Arthur No
Another word for bickering over semantics when they already understood is "toolbag" aka "butthurt" aka "not suckless." The concept is communicated clearly, regardless and doesn't have much to do with dev. On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:22:57AM

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-10 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 04:22:57AM +0200, Harry wrote: > Don't be too hard on the posts - at least they contain comments... > > which is more than can be said about the coding. > > "Not suckless" is a double negative - do they write code that way? > > Someone says they don't have to give a "beca

[dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-10 Thread Harry
Don't be too hard on the posts - at least they contain comments... which is more than can be said about the coding. "Not suckless" is a double negative - do they write code that way? Someone says they don't have to give a "because" to call something "not suckless" (i.e. "it sucks"). Is this the