Hi,
On 11 February 2015 at 20:48, FRIGN wrote:
> there's no need for a separate GitHub-repo. You are the maintainer and
> have the right to push your stuff to suckless, and at least I personally
> would really like to see the fresh changes here on suckless.org rather
> than some GitHub 0815 repos
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:29:49 +
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
Hey Connor,
> I've added these proposed functions, and done some other work too, on
> my GitHub repo [1], which is where I maintain libutf now that I no
> longer contribute particularly regularly. Please feel free to send me
> any other
Hi,
I've added these proposed functions, and done some other work too, on
my GitHub repo [1], which is where I maintain libutf now that I no
longer contribute particularly regularly. Please feel free to send me
any other patch proposals, either directly or via this mailing list
(preferably with a
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:07:52PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>> int
>> utftorunestr(const char *s, Rune *p)
>> {
>> int i, n;
>>
>> for(i = 0; (n = chartorune(&p[i], s)), p[i] != 0; i++)
>> s += n;
>> return i;
>> }
>>
>> int
>> fgetrune(Rune *p, FILE *fp)
>> {
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:07:52PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> int
> utftorunestr(const char *s, Rune *p)
> {
> int i, n;
>
> for(i = 0; (n = chartorune(&p[i], s)), p[i] != 0; i++)
> s += n;
> return i;
> }
>
> int
> fgetrune(Rune *p, FILE *fp)
> {
> ch
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:07:52 +
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> It sounds like it might be a good idea to add these to the library.
> However, I have some simplification suggestions, especially to avoid
> memory allocation inside libutf. I've attached a file illustrating the
> functions as I think
Hi FRIGN,
It's been a while since I posted to this list. I do still maintain
libutf, though -- glad to hear it's still being of use.
It sounds like it might be a good idea to add these to the library.
However, I have some simplification suggestions, especially to avoid
memory allocation inside li
