I've been using your patch pretty heavily and everything seems to be
working.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I just installed the patch and I will let you know if I still see
>> any garbage data.
>>
>
> Have you already tested it? It
Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
Thanks! I just installed the patch and I will let you know if I still
see any garbage data.
Have you already tested it? It seems ok, here. If there are no
complaints I will push out a release sometime this weekend.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-
Thanks! I just installed the patch and I will let you know if I still see
any garbage data.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 02:22:50AM -0400, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
> > I would absolutely love to see text reflowing but I think that would be
> >
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 02:22:50AM -0400, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
> I would absolutely love to see text reflowing but I think that would be
> pretty difficult with the way that text is currently handled by dvtm.
Yeah probably isn't trivial to implement, but to be honest I don't really
need it. $EDIT
I would absolutely love to see text reflowing but I think that would be
pretty difficult with the way that text is currently handled by dvtm.
By the way, there is a small bug (feature?) in my patch. It will sometimes
show old bits of text after a resize, since the extra buffer space hasn't
been z
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 12:57:09AM -0400, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
> There is a serious bug in my patch that can cause dvtm to crash which
> I have fixed. After the calls to realloc there are calls to calloc
> which were still using the cols field instead of maxcols, so there was
> a potential buffer
There is a serious bug in my patch that can cause dvtm to crash which
I have fixed. After the calls to realloc there are calls to calloc
which were still using the cols field instead of maxcols, so there was
a potential buffer overflow (if you only used the tile and monocle
modes you wouldn't run
Thanks! :)
And I realized that my patch is fine. I couldn't compile it at work, but
then I remembered that I couldn't compile dvtm using c99 at work because our
Linux box has an outdated version of glibc. I had to switch to c89 and edit
all the for loops.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Nikhile
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:02:10PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> On 9/8/10, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
> > even a Gnome user should be able to figure out how to fix it.
>
> Haha, well said, that quote is an instant classic! :-)
I have witnessed a classic in the making. :O
--
Nikhilesh S
http://www
On 9/8/10, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
> even a Gnome user should be able to figure out how to fix it.
Haha, well said, that quote is an instant classic! :-)
Whoops, looks like my patch won't compile if you are using strict C - I
declared an int in a for loop (forced habit, I work in C++ all day). When I
get home from work tonight I'll update the patch but even a Gnome user
should be able to figure out how to fix it.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:41 AM, N
11 matches
Mail list logo
