Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-23 Thread clamiax
Hi, 2012/2/22 Connor Lane Smith : > I think we can agree that the "maximize vertical/horizontal patch" > should be on a separate page, but what I don't understand is why > you're emailing this mailing list. Clearly either you should make the > change, or you should email Jan (whose email is availa

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 22 February 2012 14:19, clamiax wrote: > This mean people can put any kind of patch on suckless.org regardless > if it comply with our phylosophy or not (and place it above that which > comply instead). Ok, I just learned a new rule. I think we can agree that the "maximize vertical/horiz

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread Rob
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:19:28PM +0100, clamiax wrote: > That's most likely due to your wrong workflow, which includes moving X > clients between monitors. I'm not complain about multi-head setup, I'm > just telling you that moving windows between monitor without any kind > of criteria is a flaw

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread clamiax
2012/2/22 Rob : > I don't agree, I like moving windows with the keyboard, and the > cross-monitor thing was bugging me That's most likely due to your wrong workflow, which includes moving X clients between monitors. I'm not complain about multi-head setup, I'm just telling you that moving windows b

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread Rob
On 22 February 2012 08:58, clamiax wrote: > I'm here to discuss about the change *before* make it, since most > people may not agree with me. I don't agree, I like moving windows with the keyboard, and the cross-monitor thing was bugging me >> The 6.0 patches do look ok from my point of view. >

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-22 Thread clamiax
Hi, 2012/2/21 Anselm R Garbe : > It's a wiki after all and it would be quicker to fix the sites yourself. I'm here to discuss about the change *before* make it, since most people may not agree with me. Also I will not waste my time fixing other people defacements; nor I should. > The 6.0 patches

Re: [dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 21 February 2012 09:57, clamiax wrote: > it would be nice if Jan Christoph Ebersbach would remove its garbage > along with all unreachable URLs from the moveresize patch page to its > own page, maybe maximize_vert_horz, which have nothing to do with > moveresize. Also it would be great to move

[dev] Moveresize patch page defaced

2012-02-21 Thread clamiax
Hi, it would be nice if Jan Christoph Ebersbach would remove its garbage along with all unreachable URLs from the moveresize patch page to its own page, maybe maximize_vert_horz, which have nothing to do with moveresize. Also it would be great to move its moveresize implementation to a more approp