On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:39:51PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:04:57 +0100
> Tadeusz Sośnierz wrote:
>
> > On 29-10-2009 19:59:17, markus schnalke wrote:
> > > Surf is able to interface all kinds of programs through xprop, but
> > > not in an easy/flexible enough wa
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:04:57 +0100
Tadeusz Sośnierz wrote:
> On 29-10-2009 19:59:17, markus schnalke wrote:
> > The quoted mail makes me share my thoughts on surf's xprop
> > interface:
> >
> >
> > At first, it seems pretty nice how surf communicates with the
> > outside. But on closer looks, I
On 29-10-2009 19:59:17, markus schnalke wrote:
> The quoted mail makes me share my thoughts on surf's xprop interface:
>
>
> At first, it seems pretty nice how surf communicates with the outside.
> But on closer looks, I dislike the xprop stuff more and more.
>
> What is shown above does surely
[2009-10-29 10:42] Evan Gates
> >2) When you choose your URI (C-g by default) and then abort it
> >pressing [esc] or something, the document is trying to be loaded anyway,
> >with empty address. It's a bit too much for the setprop() macro (or is
> >it?), but I think some function may check the in
