On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Gregor Best wrote:
> Also, a fixed version of the patch is attached (with correct \t usage
> and manpage this time).
Nice, applied.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why not call it -class? That way it's xterm-compatible.
Because -- and I hope I'm not surprising you -- it's completely
inconsistent with almost every CLI tool on unix?
Making st xterm-compatible at the escape sequence level is fri
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:43:15PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> [...]
> Why not call it -class? That way it's xterm-compatible.
> One could also think about renaming -t to -title.
> [...]
Well, I wanted to keep with the current style...
Also, a fixed version of the patch is attached (with corr
Hi,
Why not call it -class? That way it's xterm-compatible.
One could also think about renaming -t to -title.
Best regards,
Moritz
Hi list,
fueled by the recent bunch of patches to st, I gave it a try. One thing
that was missing (for me) was being able to set the class of the st
window. I use that for matching terminals running different apps to
different tags so I can have an ssh session running irssi at the 'chat'
tag or ru
