Re: [dev] [slock] fixing the annoying combination with PAM

2011-04-21 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi Markus, On 19 April 2011 22:24, markus schnalke wrote: > at my university PAM is used for user login. They have slock installed > because they have the suckless-tools package (Ubuntu) installed. > > If I run slock , X gets locked like it should. Unfortunately I'm not > able to unlock it again

Re: [dev] [slock] fixing the annoying combination with PAM

2011-04-20 Thread Petr Sabata
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:24:38PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: > Hoi, > > at my university PAM is used for user login. They have slock installed > because they have the suckless-tools package (Ubuntu) installed. > > If I run slock , X gets locked like it should. Unfortunately I'm not > able to

[dev] [slock] fixing the annoying combination with PAM

2011-04-19 Thread markus schnalke
Hoi, at my university PAM is used for user login. They have slock installed because they have the suckless-tools package (Ubuntu) installed. If I run slock , X gets locked like it should. Unfortunately I'm not able to unlock it again because slock checks against /etc/passwd which does not contain