On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, sin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:18:01AM -0400, Steve Dee wrote:
>> I don't have time to do this for the next few days.
Actually, I had a bit of time before running off into the woods.
Here's something that compiles on both OpenBSD and Linux. The
conditiona
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:18:01AM -0400, Steve Dee wrote:
> Nice.
>
> BSD doesn't have mntent or /proc, but does have getmntinfo. I think we
> can create a common interface that requires a minimal amount of
> conditional compilation (though obviously no conditional compilation
> is better than an
On 07/23/2013 02:18 PM, Steve Dee wrote:
BSD doesn't have mntent or /proc, but does have getmntinfo. I think we
Well, FreeBSD has some sort of a /proc, even if intentionally
incompatible with Linux.
Nice.
BSD doesn't have mntent or /proc, but does have getmntinfo. I think we
can create a common interface that requires a minimal amount of
conditional compilation (though obviously no conditional compilation
is better than any conditional compilation), but I don't have time to
do this for the ne
Clean up the code a bit. Behave like -a by default.
>From 01cbe6a93df9d71e0fe184405895763d4498ac7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sin
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:17:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add df(1)
---
Makefile | 1 +
df.c | 53 +
2 file