On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:03:17 +0100
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I'm thinking about removing support for all
> > output formats except unified context from
> > my diff(1) candidate. I want to hear your
> > opinion.
>
> I don't like the idea at all. I use some times
> the ed output for some scripts. SCCS,
Hi,
> I'm thinking about removing support for all
> output formats except unified context from
> my diff(1) candidate. I want to hear your
> opinion.
I don't like the idea at all. I use some times
the ed output for some scripts. SCCS, RCS and
CVS use it to, so I think it is a very bad idea
to rem
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:23:07 +0100
Mattias Andrée wrote:
Waidmannsheil, Mattias,
> I'm thinking about removing support for all
> output formats except unified context from
> my diff(1) candidate. I want to hear your
> opinion.
> -f
> -e
> (no flag)
> -c
> Unified context is also the eas
Ahoy comrades!
I'm thinking about removing support for all
output formats except unified context from
my diff(1) candidate. I want to hear your
opinion.
This means removal of:
-f
ed-like diff-script that cannot be parsed
for patch(1). It is intended to be easier
for humans to read
