On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Mate Nagy wrote:
>> Would it make sense to add a
>>
>> void *aux;
>>
>> to Monitor, that patches don't need to screw around with dwm.c?
> IMHO this would be really ugly and patches mucking up dwm.c would be
> preferable to this.
>
I agree, and it wouldn't work wh
Hiho,
> > But the nasty thing is, layout patches like gaplessgrid need to know
> > Monitor when compiled.
I thought the same, when writing nmaster+bstack, but then nsz has
rewritten it in its current form, and it doesn't need to know Monitor.
Look at http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/nmaster-sym.c
2009/9/29 Tadeusz Sośnierz :
> Hello,
> I've stumbled upon this while trying to add gaplessgrid layout to my
> dwm. In pertag patch, the struct Monitor is moved after the '#include
> "config.h"' line, so it will know about 'tags' variable I guess. But
> the nasty thing is, layout patches like gaple
2009/9/29 Tadeusz Sośnierz :
> And so I run out of ideas. Is there any
> other way than moving this struct to config.h?
I guess you can include gaplessgrid.h in dwm.c right after Monitor
structure declaration.
--
Sidney Amani
Hello,
I've stumbled upon this while trying to add gaplessgrid layout to my
dwm. In pertag patch, the struct Monitor is moved after the '#include
"config.h"' line, so it will know about 'tags' variable I guess. But
the nasty thing is, layout patches like gaplessgrid need to know
Monitor when compil
