On 9 Sep 2010, at 2:07 pm, Mate Nagy wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:42:43AM -0400, Corey Thomasson wrote:
I was only referring to the channels, not the entire library. I
pointed it out more as a potential jumpstart for implementing a
select(), etc. I wasn't trying to say cchan was redundant
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:42:43AM -0400, Corey Thomasson wrote:
> I was only referring to the channels, not the entire library. I
> pointed it out more as a potential jumpstart for implementing a
> select(), etc. I wasn't trying to say cchan was redundant.
libtask is a good pointer and looks nice
I was only referring to the channels, not the entire library. I
pointed it out more as a potential jumpstart for implementing a
select(), etc. I wasn't trying to say cchan was redundant.
On 9 September 2010 08:29, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>
> that's not similar/same
>
> the entire point of the excers
* Corey Thomasson [2010-09-09 08:01:46 -0400]:
> libtask [ http://swtch.com/libtask/ ] implements something
> similar/same; however, it's a coroutine lib and I'm pretty sure it
> will not work with multiple threads.
that's not similar/same
the entire point of the excersise is to do messaging whe
libtask [ http://swtch.com/libtask/ ] implements something
similar/same; however, it's a coroutine lib and I'm pretty sure it
will not work with multiple threads.
However, it does have something like a select() for channels, see the
Alt structure and associated methods, IIRC the implementation is
Hello all,
I guess I can't get enough of the punishment I always get in these
threads. Announcing project:
http://repo.hu/projects/cchan/
'This is a small library that implements a "channel" construct for
inter-thread communication in C programs. '
This is a very small and simple lib that does
