On 01/05/14 11:36, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
> wrote:
> > I am not sure I understand why this would be wrong. Shouldn't calling ii
> > (via
> > ii or not) without arguments use the default values descibed in the man
> > page?
>
> My point is th
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
wrote:
> I am not sure I understand why this would be wrong. Shouldn't calling ii (via
> ii or not) without arguments use the default values descibed in the man page?
My point is that argc will never be less than 1 (AFAIK). If you want
to u
On 01/05/14 07:34, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
> wrote:
> > ii could be called without any argument, using the defaults described in the
> > manpage.
> >
> > - if (argc <= 1 || (argc == 2 && argv[1][0] == '-' && argv[1][1] ==
> > 'h')) usag
Hi Jean-Philippe,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
wrote:
> ii could be called without any argument, using the defaults described in the
> manpage.
>
> - if (argc <= 1 || (argc == 2 && argv[1][0] == '-' && argv[1][1] ==
> 'h')) usage();
> + if (argc < 1 || (
ii could be called without any argument, using the defaults described in the
manpage.
diff --git a/ii.c b/ii.c
index d93266c..0816009 100644
--- a/ii.c
+++ b/ii.c
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
}
snprintf(nick, sizeof(nick), "%s", spw->pw_name);
snpr
