Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-13 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-13 06:55, Storkman wrote: Check out the man page for xinit. You can specify the server and options to it on the command line. I tried doing 'xinit -- /usr/bin/Xfbdev :0 vt1' Sadly, when I do this, keyboard input doesn't work, and I can't even switch to another tty. Doing 'xinit

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-12 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-13 00:02, Storkman wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:07:45PM +, stefan1 wrote: Not really related to what was discussed earlier, but I thought I might find someone who can help me with this here. I have this script for starting Xfbdev and running my .xinitrc: ``` #!/bin/sh

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-12 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-12 21:35, Eric Pruitt wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 08:07:45PM +, stefan1 wrote: Does anyone know how to improve the above script to get it to kill X after I kill dwm? Is vt1 a script that launches dwm? When you press Alt+Q to kill dwm, does this also kill any other

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-12 Thread stefan11111
Not really related to what was discussed earlier, but I thought I might find someone who can help me with this here. I have this script for starting Xfbdev and running my .xinitrc: ``` #!/bin/sh export DISPLAY=${DISPLAY:-:0} trap "$HOME/.xinitrc" USR1 ( trap '' USR1 exec /usr/bin/Xfbd

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-12 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-11 23:18, stefan1 wrote: În 11 noiembrie 2024 23:17:48 EET, Storkman a scris: On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:18:03AM +, stefan1 wrote: On 2024-11-05 10:37, stefan1 wrote: > > Looks like git st works. Looked into it a bit more, and it turns out that the reason it

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-11 Thread stefan11111
În 11 noiembrie 2024 23:17:48 EET, Storkman a scris: >On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:18:03AM +0000, stefan11111 wrote: >> On 2024-11-05 10:37, stefan1 wrote: >> > >> > Looks like git st works. >> >> Looked into it a bit more, and it turns out that the r

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-07 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-05 10:37, stefan1 wrote: Looks like git st works. Looked into it a bit more, and it turns out that the reason it failed like that is not because of code from st, but because of the alpha patch for st. XftColorAllocName() fails(likely not implemented in tinyx), which kills

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-05 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-05 00:03, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: Hi, Many years ago I tested tinyx. It was quite nice and small. If there are (small) changes required for st, dmenu and dmenu to work (again). Feel free to send them. Looks like git st works. dmenu and dwm also work. -- Linux-gentoo-x86_64-Intel

Re: [dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-04 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-11-03 23:57, stefan1 wrote: For those of you who use gentoo, I also have an ebuild for this patched tinyx in my overlay: https://github.com/stefan1/stefan_overlay/blob/main/x11-base/tinyx/tinyx-1.1.ebuild This link is now broken, as someone pointed out a better way to manage

[dev] tinyx port to libXfont2

2024-11-03 Thread stefan11111
my overlay: https://github.com/stefan1/stefan_overlay/blob/main/x11-base/tinyx/tinyx-1.1.ebuild So far, every X11 app I tested works, with the exception of st. Xterm works however. Even palemoon works. St fails like so: $ st X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes

Re: [dev] About xorg and mesa

2024-09-03 Thread stefan11111
For some reason, hardware acceleration didn't work for my gpu. See this thread on the gentoo forums: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1164703.html În 3 septembrie 2024 22:35:46 EEST, Sean MacLennan a scris: >On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:54:36 + >stefan1 wrote: > &g

[dev] About xorg and mesa

2024-09-03 Thread stefan11111
/1638 For those who can't/don't want to open the above link and read the posts, this is what I use to avoid building mesa: https://github.com/stefan1/dri_interface.h Thoughts? -- Linux-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-_i5-7400_CPU_@_3.00GHz COMMON_FLAGS="-O3 -pipe -march=na

[dev] An update about my gtk2 fork

2024-07-22 Thread stefan11111
Hi suckless enjoyers. Beware, this is quite a long mail. I have come with an update 6 months after this thread: https://lists.suckless.org/dev/2401/35517.html To those who can't open that link in their mailer, it's the thread where I presented my fork of gtk2: https://github.com/s

Re: [dev] [dwm][st] why use ints over bools?

2024-06-21 Thread stefan11111
În 22 iunie 2024 00:10:52 EEST, "Страхиња Радић" a scris: >Дана 24/06/21 09:14PM, Markus Wichmann написа: >> Isn't it all about familiarity in the end? Or can you articulate what >> parts of C11 and C23 you find objectionable? > >Just a few examples: > >- C11: bounds checking interfaces (now e

Re: [dev] [dwm][st] why use ints over bools?

2024-06-15 Thread stefan11111
What about using char's then? În 15 iunie 2024 15:36:16 EEST, "Mattias Andrée" a scris: >I have some general issues with _Bool: > >Arithmetic or bitwise operations on _Bool is subject to type promotion >making them rather pointless. > >With also be a problem if they were not, as you than couldn't

[dev] Presenting some more software

2024-01-13 Thread stefan11111
Since a few people found the software I listed in my last email useful, I'll do this again. First off, my fork of kirc with extra features: https://github.com/stefan1/kirc It has some nice additions to https://github.com/mcpcpp/kirc, like dcc support, both ipv4 and ipv6, timestamping,

Re: [dev] gtk2 without atk

2024-01-11 Thread stefan11111
În 12 ianuarie 2024 02:52:31 EET, Storkman a scris: >On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:46:15PM +0000, stefan11111 wrote: >> >> Hi dev ml readers. >> I am going to shill some of my software on this list after getting it to >> a decent point. >> >> I pres

Re: [dev] gtk2 without atk

2024-01-11 Thread stefan11111
În 12 ianuarie 2024 01:38:56 EET, Eric Pruitt a scris: >On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:46:15PM +0000, stefan11111 wrote: >> Is anyone else here interested in this? >> Does anyone have similar projects? > >I think there's nothing wrong with wanting slimmer software, and

[dev] gtk2 without atk

2024-01-11 Thread stefan11111
Hi dev ml readers. I am going to shill some of my software on this list after getting it to a decent point. I present to you, gtk2 without atk and forced accessiblilty: https://github.com/stefan1/gtk2 And for those who want to use gtk3: https://github.com/stefan1/atk Is anyone else

Re: [dev] what is a suckless way to add a few keyboard shortcuts to Firefox

2024-01-07 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-01-05 14:33, Страхиња Радић wrote: On 24/01/05 02:08PM, stefan1 wrote: Aside from ungoogled chromium, which browser would you say it's worth using? Preferably not chromium based and not tied to google/mozilla/big company>'s whims and shady interests. That's the

Re: [dev] what is a suckless way to add a few keyboard shortcuts to Firefox

2024-01-05 Thread stefan11111
On 2024-01-05 07:14, Страхиња Радић wrote: On 24/01/05 04:14AM, stefan1 wrote: Maybe even remove my desktop all together at that point. :) Root window + st, with a terminal multiplexer is all that is needed. Desktop icons are just eye candy, and inefficient when moving a mouse to a

Re: [dev] what is a suckless way to add a few keyboard shortcuts to Firefox

2024-01-04 Thread stefan11111
În 4 ianuarie 2024 21:23:54 EET, "Страхиња Радић" a scris: >> what is a suckless way to add a few keyboard shortcuts to Firefox > >Edit its source code (unironically). Anyone who would laugh at this proposal >doesn't actually understand or accept suckless philosophy. > >* * * > >BTW, Web suck

Re: [dev] libsecret implementation

2023-10-10 Thread stefan11111
>D-Bus is bloat in itself and should be avoided if possible, just like related >bloatware such as systemd. > >[1]: https://github.com/grawity/secretsd +1 I've yet to see a good reason to use dbus.